The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation
Abstract
This analysis of how the ability to participate in society online affects political and economic opportunity finds that technology use matters in wages and income and civic participation and voting. Just as education has promoted democracy and economic growth, the Internet has the potential to benefit society as a whole. Digital citizenship, or the ability to participate in society online, promotes social inclusion. But statistics show that significant segments of the population are still excluded from digital citizenship. The authors of this book define digital citizens as those who are online daily. By focusing on frequent use, they reconceptualize debates about the digital divide to include both the means and the skills to participate online. They offer new evidence (drawn from recent national opinion surveys and Current Population Surveys) that technology use matters for wages and income, and for civic engagement and voting. Digital Citizenship examines three aspects of participation in society online: economic opportunity, democratic participation, and inclusion in prevailing forms of communication. The authors find that Internet use at work increases wages, with less-educated and minority workers receiving the greatest benefit, and that Internet use is significantly related to political participation, especially among the young. The authors examine in detail the gaps in technological access among minorities and the poor and predict that this digital inequality is not likely to disappear in the near future. Public policy, they argue, must address educational and technological disparities if we are to achieve full participation and citizenship in the twenty-first century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Digital Rights, Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy: What’s the Difference?
Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2021) · Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research · doi:10.7821/naer.2021.1.616 · Cited by 284
Measuring Digital Capital: An empirical investigation
Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., & Addeo, F. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819869604 · Cited by 226
All the news That’s fit to click: the economics of clickbait media
Munger, K. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626 · Cited by 175
Internet voting in comparative perspective: the case of Estonia
Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., & Trechsel, A. H. (2009) · PS: Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096509090787 · Cited by 163
Barriers to Employment among Unemployed Drug Users: Age Predicts Severity
Sigurdsson, S. O., Ring, B. M., O’Reilly, K., & Silverman, K. (2012) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.3109/00952990.2011.643976 · Cited by 48
A Bigger Pie: The Effects of High-Speed Internet on Political Behavior
Lelkes, Y. (2020) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmaa002 · Cited by 33
Aslam, R., Khan, N., Asad, M. M., & Ahmed, U. (2021) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-11-2020-0222 · Cited by 24
Arkorful, V., Salifu, I., Arthur, F., & Abam Nortey, S. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2326722 · Cited by 23
Morales-Álvarez, A., Valdés-Cuervo, A. A., & Parra-Pérez, L. G. (2025) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2025-1-2 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2007-10-12
- OpenAlex
- W4254128747
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.