Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet
Abstract
An exploration of the technical, social, legal, and economic aspects of the scholarly infrastructure needed to support research activities in all fields in the twenty-first century. Scholars in all fields now have access to an unprecedented wealth of online information, tools, and services. The Internet lies at the core of an information infrastructure for distributed, data-intensive, and collaborative research. Although much attention has been paid to the new technologies making this possible, from digitized books to sensor networks, it is the underlying social and policy changes that will have the most lasting effect on the scholarly enterprise. In Scholarship in the Digital Age, Christine Borgman explores the technical, social, legal, and economic aspects of the kind of infrastructure that we should be building for scholarly research in the twenty-first century. Borgman describes the roles that information technology plays at every stage in the life cycle of a research project and contrasts these new capabilities with the relatively stable system of scholarly communication, which remains based on publishing in journals, books, and conference proceedings. No framework for the impending “data deluge” exists comparable to that for publishing. Analyzing scholarly practices in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities, Borgman compares each discipline's approach to infrastructure issues. In the process, she challenges the many stakeholders in the scholarly infrastructure—scholars, publishers, libraries, funding agencies, and others—to look beyond their own domains to address the interaction of technical, legal, economic, social, political, and disciplinary concerns. Scholarship in the Digital Age will provoke a stimulating conversation among all who depend on a rich and robust scholarly environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As the popularity of arXiv and other preprint servers grew steadily despite disincentives, publishers began to move away increasingly from the Ingelfinger rule.
“As the popularity of arXiv and other preprint servers grew steadily despite the disincentives, publishers began to move away increasingly from the Ingelfinger rule (Borgman 2007).”
From The structural transformation of the scientific public sphere: Constitution and consequences of the path towards open access (2024) · cites this paper as Borgman 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 · Cited by 1,240 · see citing works
Wallis, J. C., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C. L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067332 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Self-citationElectronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns
Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Edwards, S., & Wu, L. (2009) · Aslib Proceedings · doi:10.1108/00012530910932267 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Reale, E., Avramov, D., Canhial, K., Donovan, C., Flecha, R., Holm, P., Larkin, C., Lepori, B., Mosoni-Fried, J., Oliver, E., et al. (2018) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvx025 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Data reusers’ trust development
Yoon, A. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23730 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Suhaimi, N., Yongsatianchot, N., Gaggiano, J. D., Kim, M., Patel, S. A., Sun, Y., Marsella, S., Griffin, J., & Parker, A. G. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501889 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Furner, J. (2016) · Information Cultures in the Digital Age · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_17 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Dobusch, L., & Heimstädt, M. (2024) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537231203558 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“As the popularity of arXiv and other preprint servers grew steadily despite the disincentives, publishers began to move away increasingly from the Ingel fi nger rule (Borgman 2007).”
Background
- Authors
- Borgman, C. L.
- Corresponding author
- Borgman, Christine L.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2007-10-12
- OpenAlex
- W2792974390
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 37.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- academic infrastructure, scholarly communication, digital libraries, research data management, data deluge, scholarly publishing, information technology in research, research funding agencies, libraries, digital humanities, social sciences, science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review