Cited by 17Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Predicative Minds: The Social Ontogeny of Propositional Thinking

Bogdan, Radu J.·2009·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

An exploration of why and how the human competence for predication came to be. The predicative mind singles out and represents an item in order to attribute to it a property, a relation, an action, an evaluation; it thinks, and says, of a house that it is big, of a car that it is to the left of the house, of a cat that it is about to jump, of a hypothesis that it is plausible. The capacity to predicate appears to be neither innate nor learned, yet it is universal among humans. Puzzling in evolutionary, developmental, and philosophical terms, the mental competence for predication still awaits a coherent and plausible explanation. In this exploration of the predicative roots of human thinking, Radu Bogdan takes up the challenge. Bogdan argues that predication is not only an outcome of development but also a by-product of uniquely human features of development, many of them social in nature and unrelated to representation, cognition, and thinking. Humans develop predicative minds for disparate reasons, which bear initially on physiological coregulation, affective and manipulative communication, and the socially shared acquisition of words. Once developed, the competence for predication in turn redesigns human thinking and communication. Predication is at the heart of conscious, deliberate, explicit, and language-based human thinking, and it is the fuel of higher mental activities. Understanding the uniqueness and representational power of the human mind, Bogdan contends, require…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/7861.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Babies make sense of their world through non-predicative distinctions and evaluations based on sensation, before they can make predicative representations.

    “They make distinctions and evaluate those distinctions based on sensation; building up an understanding of the world without making predicative assertions about it.”

    From Carnal Hermeneutics and the Digital Game (2018) · cites this paper as Bogdan 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bogdan, R. J.
Corresponding author
Bogdan, Radu J.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2009-01-09
OpenAlex
W4249498122
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
predication, human cognition, cognitive evolution, social cognition, co-regulation, emotional communication, language acquisition, representational thinking, human uniqueness, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review