The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flexibility in Engineering Design
Abstract
A guide to using the power of design flexibility to improve the performance of complex technological projects, for designers, managers, users, and analysts. Project teams can improve results by recognizing that the future is inevitably uncertain and that by creating flexible designs they can adapt to eventualities. This approach enables them to take advantage of new opportunities and avoid harmful losses. Designers of complex, long-lasting projects—such as communication networks, power plants, or hospitals—must learn to abandon fixed specifications and narrow forecasts. They need to avoid the “flaw of averages,” the conceptual pitfall that traps so many designs in underperformance. Failure to allow for changing circumstances risks leaving significant value untapped. This book is a guide for creating and implementing value-enhancing flexibility in design. It will be an essential resource for all participants in the development and operation of technological systems: designers, managers, financial analysts, investors, regulators, and academics. The book provides a high-level overview of why flexibility in design is needed to deliver significantly increased value. It describes in detail methods to identify, select, and implement useful flexibility. The book is unique in that it explicitly recognizes that future outcomes are uncertain. It thus presents forecasting, analysis, and evaluation tools especially suited to this reality. Appendixes provide expanded explanations of concepts and analytic tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: A review
Alizadeh, M. I., Parsa Moghaddam, M., Amjady, N., Siano, P., & Sheikh-El-Eslami, M. K. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.200 · Cited by 389
Kwakkel, J. H., Haasnoot, M., & Walker, W. E. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017 · Cited by 261
Green infrastructure: The future of urban flood risk management?
Green, D., O'Donnell, E., Johnson, M., Slater, L., Thorne, C., Zheng, S., Stirling, R., Chan, F. K. S., Li, L., & Boothroyd, R. J. (2021) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1560 · Cited by 178
Development and valuation of adaptation pathways for storm water management infrastructure
Manocha, N., & Babovic, V. (2017) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.001 · Cited by 54
Advancing Architecture Options Theory: Six Industrial Case Studies
Engel, A., & Reich, Y. (2015) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21312 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- de Neufville, R., & Scholtes, S.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2011-08-12
- OpenAlex
- W2415944271
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.35
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flexibility in Engineering Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/8292.001.0001
- The paper
- de Neufville, R., & Scholtes, S. (2011). Flexibility in Engineering Design. The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8292.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.