The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance
Open accessAbstract
This paper seeks to broaden the debate about edemocracy.Since the emergence of the e-democracy movement, most projects and analyses have used rich and sustained deliberation on an often-romanticized "Athenian" or "public sphere" model as a yardstick to both judge and empirically measure outcomes.This approach, heavily influenced by an ideal of rational critical discourse, has proved notoriously difficult to embed in political organizations.As a consequence, the use of digital network technologies to shape public policy is generally met with incredulity by most politicians, public servants, and citizens.Following a brief critique of the assumptions underlying the literature to date, this paper sketches out an alternative approach-one based on the incentive structures that seem to shape how public servants and citizens now behave online.The approach is derived from preliminary observations of the low threshold co-production behavior characteristic of what has come to be known as "web 2.0."While it may not live up to the high ideals of the deliberative public sphere, some of this behavior has real value in online consultation and public policymaking.We should acknowledge that successful e-democracy programs may require a plurality of different sociotechnical values and mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Chadwick, A. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001 · Cited by 1,174
Self-citationHalpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008 · Cited by 631
Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’
Dahlberg, L. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810389569 · Cited by 470
Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities
Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Chadwick, A.
- Venue
- Connecting Democracy
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2011-12-16
- Pages
- 45-74
- OpenAlex
- W317417172
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 499.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/9006.003.0005
- The paper
- Chadwick, A. (2011). Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance. Connecting Democracy. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9006.003.0005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.