The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aesthetics of Interaction in Digital Art
Abstract
An art-historical perspective on interactive media art that provides theoretical and methodological tools for understanding and analyzing digital art. Since the 1960s, artworks that involve the participation of the spectator have received extensive scholarly attention. Yet interactive artworks using digital media still present a challenge for academic art history. In this book, Katja Kwastek argues that the particular aesthetic experience enabled by these new media works can open up new perspectives for our understanding of art and media alike. Kwastek, herself an art historian, offers a set of theoretical and methodological tools that are suitable for understanding and analyzing not only new media art but also other contemporary art forms. Addressing both the theoretician and the practitioner, Kwastek provides an introduction to the history and the terminology of interactive art, a theory of the aesthetics of interaction, and exemplary case studies of interactive media art. Kwastek lays the historical and theoretical groundwork and then develops an aesthetics of interaction, discussing such aspects as real space and data space, temporal structures, instrumental and phenomenal perspectives, and the relationship between materiality and interpretability. Finally, she applies her theory to specific works of interactive media art, including narratives in virtual and real space, interactive installations, and performance—with case studies of works by Olia Lialina, Susanne Berkenheger, Stefan Schemat, Teri Rueb, Lynn Hershman, Agnes Hegedüs, Tmema, David Rokeby, Sonia Cillari, and Blast Theory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, the participant's capability to always rephrase the state of immersion is part of the artistic process and the aesthetic experience.”
From Sending Shivers Down the Spine. VR Productions as Seamed Media (2019) · cites this paper as Kwastek 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sending Shivers Down the Spine. VR Productions as Seamed Media
Bakk, Á. K. (2019) · Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Film and Media Studies · doi:10.2478/ausfm-2019-0020 · Cited by 2
“However, this doesn’t exclude the possibility that this realization may also turn into a creative activity, within which the interaction system will become a facilitator for the creation of manifestations – which in turn can become the object of a contemplative observation” (Kwastek 2013, 262).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwastek, K.
- Corresponding author
- Kwastek, Katja
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2013-09-13
- OpenAlex
- W4302430368
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 21.76
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Politics, and Modernism
- Keywords
- interactive art, new media art, aesthetics of interaction, audience participation, data spaces, real space, temporal structure, interactive installation, interactive performance, virtual space, Blast Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review