The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carnal Resonance: Affect and Online Pornography
Abstract
An exploration of the modalities, affective intensities, and disturbing qualities of online pornography. Digital production tools and online networks have dramatically increased the general visibility, accessibility, and diversity of pornography. Porn can be accessed for free, anonymously, and in a seemingly endless range of niches, styles, and formats. In Carnal Resonance, Susanna Paasonen moves beyond the usual debates over the legal, political, and moral aspects of pornography to address online porn in a media historical framework, investigating its modalities, its affect, and its visceral and disturbing qualities. Countering theorizations of pornography as emotionless, affectless, detached, and cold, Paasonen addresses experiences of porn largely through the notion of affect as gut reactions, intensities of experience, bodily sensations, resonances, and ambiguous feelings. She links these investigations to considerations of methodology (ways of theorizing and analyzing online porn and affect), questions of materiality (bodies, technologies, and inscriptions), and the evolution of online pornography. Paasonen dicusses the development of online porn, focusing on the figure of the porn consumer, and considers user-generated content and amateur porn. She maps out the modality of online porn as hyperbolic, excessive, stylized, and repetitive, arguing that literal readings of the genre misunderstand its dynamics and appeal. And she analyzes viral videos and extreme and shock pornogaphy, arguing for the centrality of disgust and shame in the affective dynamics of porn. Paasonen's analysis makes clear the crucial role of media technologies—digital production tools and networked communications in particular—in the forms that porn takes, the resonances it stirs, and the experiences it makes possible.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In her study of amateur pornography, Paasonen (2011) mentions that authentic imagery is often blurry, out of focus, and less well-lit. Although camera technology has developed profoundly over the last ten years, we observed the same tendencies across the sites.”
From Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices: Negotiating boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning and intimacy (2022) · cites this paper as Paasonen (2011)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
‘This is my cheating ex’: Gender and sexuality in revenge porn
Hearn, J., & Hall, M. (2019) · Sexualities · doi:10.1177/1363460718779965 · Cited by 52
Rasmussen, P. K. B., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2022) · MedieKultur. Journal of Media and Communication Research · doi:10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125300 · Cited by 7
“In her study of amateur pornography, Paasonen (2011) mentions that authentic imagery is often blurry, out of focus, and less well-lit.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Paasonen, S.
- Corresponding author
- Paasonen, Susanna
- ORCID
- Paasonen, Susanna
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2011-09-30
- OpenAlex
- W4231826323
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Keywords
- online pornography, affect, media history, networked communication, user-generated content, amateur pornography, viral videos, extreme pornography, disgust, shame, bodily sensations, media technology, materiality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review