Cited by 312Evolution and Paleontology StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy and History of Science

Convergent Evolution: Limited Forms Most Beautiful

McGhee, George R·2011·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

An analysis of convergent evolution from molecules to ecosystems, demonstrating the limited number of evolutionary pathways available to life. Charles Darwin famously concluded On the Origin of Species with a vision of “endless forms most beautiful” continually evolving. More than 150 years later many evolutionary biologists see not endless forms but the same, or very similar, forms evolving repeatedly in many independent species lineages. A porpoise's fishlike fins, for example, are not inherited from fish ancestors but are independently derived convergent traits. In this book, George McGhee describes the ubiquity of the phenomenon of convergent evolution and connects it directly to the concept of evolutionary constraint—the idea that the number of evolutionary pathways available to life are not endless, but quite limited. Convergent evolution occurs on all levels, from tiny organic molecules to entire ecosystems of species. McGhee demonstrates its ubiquity in animals, both herbivore and carnivore; in plants; in ecosystems; in molecules, including DNA, proteins, and enzymes; and even in minds, describing problem-solving behavior and group behavior as the products of convergence. For each species example, he provides an abbreviated list of the major nodes in its phylogenetic classification, allowing the reader to see the evolutionary relationship of a group of species that have independently evolved a similar trait by convergent evolution. McGhee analyzes the role of functional and developmental constraints in producing convergent evolution, and considers the scientific and philosophical implications of convergent evolution for the predictability of the evolutionary process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/9780262016421.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence for convergent evolution challenges the idea that an alternative biosphere would look alien to ours.

    “The evidence for convergent evolution has challenged the idea that an alternative biosphere would look alien to ours [10,26,27].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGhee, G. R.
Corresponding author
McGhee, George R
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2011-11-04
OpenAlex
W4241074508
Cited by
312
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.72
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
convergent evolution, evolutionary constraints, evolutionary pathways, developmental constraints, functional constraints, molecular evolution, ecosystem evolution, animal evolution, plant evolution, problem-solving behavior, group behavior, predictability of evolution, phylogenetic classification, On the Origin of Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review