The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plastic Water: The Social and Material Life of Bottled Water
Abstract
How and why branded bottles of water have insinuated themselves into our daily lives, and what the implications are for safe urban water supplies. How did branded bottles of water insinuate themselves into our daily lives? Why did water become an economic good—no longer a common resource but a commercial product, in industry parlance a “fast moving consumer good,” or FMCG? Plastic Water examines the processes behind this transformation. It goes beyond the usual political and environmental critiques of bottled water to investigate its multiplicity, examining a bottle of water's simultaneous existence as, among other things, a product, personal health resource, object of boycotts, and part of accumulating waste matter. Throughout, the book focuses on the ontological dimensions of drinking bottled water—the ways in which this habit enacts new relations and meanings that may interfere with other drinking water practices. The book considers the assemblage and emergence of a mass market for water, from the invention of the polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle in 1973 to the development of “hydration science” that accompanied the rise of jogging in the United States. It looks at what bottles do in the world, tracing drinking and disposal practices in three Asian cities with unreliable access to safe water: Bangkok, Chennai, and Hanoi. And it considers the possibility of ethical drinking, examining campaigns to “say no” to the bottle and promote the consumption of tap water in Canada, the United States, and Australia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, a more critical view suggests that it should be understood in the context of the wide variation in the quality of public tap water, the extent of municipal water coverage, the public (lack of) trust in tap water in each country, and the industry's implicit and explicit efforts to position bottled water as a desirable healthy lifestyle choice and as superior to tap water [12,22-24,35].”
From Bottled Water: An Evidence-Based Overview of Economic Viability, Environmental Impact, and Social Equity (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“The evolution of bottled water from health necessity (i.e., a way to ensure good water quality) to a lifestyle and cultural choice has environmental and social implications, as well as industrial and commercial ones [22-24].”
From Bottled Water: An Evidence-Based Overview of Economic Viability, Environmental Impact, and Social Equity (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cited by
Hawkins, G. (2017) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1203 · Cited by 50
Self-citationParag, Y., Elimelech, E., & Opher, T. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15129760 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkins, G., Potter, E., & Race, K.
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2015-08-21
- OpenAlex
- W4230426535
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Water management and technologies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › American History and Culture
- Keywords
- bottled water, commodification of water, fast-moving consumer goods, PET bottles, jogging, drinking practices, waste disposal, boycotts, urban water supply, Bangkok, Chennai, Hanoi
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.