Collaborative Watershed Partnerships in the Epoch of Sustainability
Abstract
This chapter summarizes the current state of knowledge about the factors influencing the success of watershed partnerships. It begins by discussing a conceptual framework for watershed partnerships that identifies aspects of the collaborative process, participants, and context that may influence effectiveness. It then presents the findings from the watershed partnerships literature, focusing in depth on the National Estuary Program (NEP) study and the Watershed Partnership Project (WPP). The conceptual framework presented in this chapter receives further testing through a new set of parallel analyses of the NEP and WPP data. The framework and analysis were originally developed for a working paper commissioned by the National Research Council.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adequate budget support and other necessary resources help make collaboration successful.
“Adequate budget support and other needed resources are also instrumental to successful collaboration (Lubell, Leach, and Sabatier 2009).”
From An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance (2012) · cites this paper as Lubell, Leach, and Sabatier 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011 · Cited by 3,637 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lubell, M., Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A.
- Venue
- Toward Sustainable Communities
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2009-03-06
- Pages
- 255-288
- OpenAlex
- W2494692248
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental Science and Water Management
- Keywords
- watershed partnerships, collaborative governance, partnership effectiveness, conceptual framework, National Estuary Program, sustainability, estuary management, stakeholder engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review