Cited by 213Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceSustainable Development and Environmental ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem Services

The Problem of Fit among Biophysical Systems, Environmental and Resource Regimes, and Broader Governance Systems: Insights and Emerging Challenges

Galaz, Victor, Olsson, Per, Hahn, Thomas, Folke, Carl, Svedin, Uno·2008·Institutions and Environmental Change

Abstract

This chapter begins with a short description of “the problem of fit” and the relationship between human and biophysical systems in the ecosystems as detailed in the research of the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. It goes on to represent the misfits between environmental institutions and biophysical and socioecological systems. A major part of the chapter discusses the correlation and the anatomy of misfits between biophysical, environmental, and resource regimes with reference to the governance systems. The challenges involved in the governance systems cover the subsequent parts of the chapter, which also explores the emergence and evolution of knowledge-producing systems from the “problem of fit.” The concluding part of the chapter briefly explains the possible ways of dealing with the disturbing misfits between biophysical systems and governance, and also states that the fit between the preceding systems can be enhanced but with attention to the broader governance systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/9780262240574.003.0005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Redundant or back-up teams of decision makers experimenting with different rule combinations may significantly reduce the risk of policy failure for an entire region, thereby increasing the stability or resilience of a natural resource system.

    “As this example illustrates, the existence of redundant or back-up teams of decision makers experimenting with different rule combinations may significantly reduce the risk of policy failure for an entire region, thereby increasing the stability or resilience of a natural resource system (Galaz et al., 2008).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Galaz et al., 2008

  • These place-specific responses take the form of diverse institutional arrangements.

    “As Galaz et al. (2008) observe, these 'placespecific responses' take the form of diverse institutional arrangements, implicating enabling condition 4.1.1, which stipulates that decision-making centers employ diverse institutions.”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Galaz et al., 2008

  • Higher-level and/or cross-jurisdiction decision makers in a polycentric governance system are necessary to deal with concerns that cascade across levels or jurisdictions.

    “In this case, higher-level and/ or cross-jurisdiction decision makers in a polycentric governance system are necessary to deal with concerns that cascade across levels or jurisdictions (Galaz et al., 2008; Lebel et al., 2006).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Galaz et al., 2008

  • Participation in cross-scale linkages or other mechanisms for deliberation and learning may be necessary for this purpose.

    “As governance actors may be widely dispersed in a polycentric governance system, participation in cross-scale linkages or other mechanisms for deliberation and learning (enabling condition 4.1.3) may be necessary for this purpose (Galaz et al., 2008; Imperial, 1999).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Galaz et al., 2008

  • The creation of redundant decision-making centers in a polycentric governance system may entail additional costs and appear inefficient, but it may be an efficient governance strategy if it avoids the loss of a resource.

    “While the creation of redundant decision-making centers in a polycentric governance system may entail additional costs and appear inefficient, it may in fact be an efficient governance strategy if it avoids the loss of a resource (Galaz et al., 2008).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Galaz et al., 2008

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 213

Authors
Galaz, V., Olsson, P., Hahn, T., Folke, C., & Svedin, U.
Venue
Institutions and Environmental Change
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2008-08-22
Pages
147-186
OpenAlex
W589667091
Cited by
213
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
20.23
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
biophysical systems, environmental institutions, resource regimes, governance systems, social-ecological systems, knowledge production, environmental governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review