Cited by 3Spatial Cognition and NavigationLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeData Visualization and Analytics

Reasoning with Diagrams: Toward a Broad Ontology of Spatial Thinking Strategies

Hegarty, Mary, Stieff, Mike, Dixon, Bonnie·2014·Space in Mind

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/9811.003.0005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 3

Authors
Hegarty, M., Stieff, M., & Dixon, B.
Venue
Space in Mind
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2014-11-21
Pages
75-98
OpenAlex
W4232240382
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
spatial thinking, diagrammatic reasoning, cognitive strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review