Human brain ancestral barcodes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Dynamic CpG methylation ‘barcodes’ were read from 15,000–21,000 single cells from three human male brains. To overcome sparse sequencing coverage, the barcode had ~31,000 rapidly fluctuating X-chromosome CpG sites (fCpGs), with at least 500 covered sites per cell and at least 30 common sites between cell pairs (average of ~48). Barcodes appear to start methylated and record mitotic ages because excitatory neurons and glial cells that emerge later in development were less methylated. Barcodes are different between most cells, with average pairwise differences (PWDs) of ~0.5 between cells. About 10 cell pairs per million were more closely related with PWDs <0.05. Barcodes appear to record ancestry and reconstruct trees where more related cells had similar phenotypes, albeit some pairs had phenotypic differences. Inhibitory neurons showed more evidence of tangential migration than excitatory neurons, with related cells in different cortical regions. fCpG barcodes become polymorphic during development and can distinguish between thousands of human cells.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methylation barcodes and epigenetic clocks represent the latest advancements in the field.
“Methylation barcodes and epigenetic clocks represent the latest advancements in the field [58,59,60].”
From Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
The Introduction (page unavailable) presents fluctuating CpG methylation as a dynamic barcode for studying human brain development, supporting the methylation-barcode part of the claim. The paper does not describe epigenetic clocks as a latest advancement; a methylation-clock study appears only in its References (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Somatic mutation in single human neurons tracks developmental and transcriptional history
Lodato, M. A., Woodworth, M. B., Lee, S., Evrony, G. D., Mehta, B. K., Karger, A., Lee, S., Chittenden, T. W., D’Gama, A. M., Cai, X., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1785 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
An epigenetic barrier sets the timing of human neuronal maturation
Ciceri, G., Baggiolini, A., Cho, H. S., Kshirsagar, M., Benito-Kwiecinski, S., Walsh, R. M., Aromolaran, K. A., Gonzalez-Hernandez, A. J., Munguba, H., Koo, S. Y., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06984-8 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Stiles, J., & Jernigan, T. L. (2010). The basics of brain development. Neuropsychology Review, 20, 327-348.
- Gage, F. H. (2002). Neurogenesis in the adult brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 612-613.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review
Weiskirchen, R. (2026) · Medical Sciences · doi:10.3390/medsci14010025 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shibata, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shibata, Darryl
- ORCID
- Shibata, Darryl
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2025-06-10
- Volume
- 13
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11275915
- OpenAlex
- W4411187404
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P01CA196569, CA271237)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- X chromosome, human brain development, neuronal lineage, excitatory neurons, inhibitory neurons, glial cells, tangential migration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review