AI-enabled alkaline-resistant evolution of protein to apply in mass production
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been used to study the compositional regularities of proteins in nature, enabling it to assist in protein design to improve the efficiency of protein engineering and reduce manufacturing cost. However, in industrial settings, proteins are often required to work in extreme environments where they are relatively scarce or even non-existent in nature. Since such proteins are almost absent in the training datasets, it is uncertain whether AI model possesses the capability of evolving the protein to adapt extreme conditions. Antibodies are crucial components of affinity chromatography, and they are hoped to remain active at the extreme environments where most proteins cannot tolerate. In this study, we applied an advanced large language model (LLM), the Pro-PRIME model, to improve the alkali resistance of a representative antibody, a VHH antibody capable of binding to growth hormone. Through two rounds of design, we ensured that the selected mutant has enhanced functionality, including higher thermal stability, extreme pH resistance, and stronger affinity, thereby validating the generalized capability of the LLM in meeting specific demands. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first LLM-designed protein product, which is successfully applied in mass production.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families
Madani, A., Krause, B., Greene, E. R., Subramanian, S., Mohr, B. P., Holton, J. M., Olmos, J. L., Xiong, C., Sun, Z. Z., Socher, R., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · Cited by 1,078 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent advances in large-scale protein language models (LLMs) have enabled zero-shot predictions of protein mutants based on self-supervised learning from natural protein sequences ( Hie et al., 2021 ; Madani et al., 2023 ; Rao et al., 2021 ; Rives et al., 2021 ).”
Deep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction
Li, F., Yuan, L., Lu, H., Li, G., Chen, Y., Engqvist, M. K. M., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00798-z · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Rapid protein stability prediction using deep learning representations
Blaabjerg, L. M., Kassem, M. M., Good, L. L., Jonsson, N., Cagiada, M., Johansson, K. E., Boomsma, W., Stein, A., & Lindorff-Larsen, K. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.82593 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Kang, L., Wu, B., Zhou, B., Tan, P., Kang, Y. (., Yan, Y., Zong, Y., Li, S., Liu, Z., & Hong, L.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Institute of Natural Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
- Changchun GeneScience Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
- Harbin Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Zhuo
- Hong, Liang
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2025-02-19
- Volume
- 13
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11839161
- OpenAlex
- W4404929325
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (12204302)
- Computational Biology Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (23JS1400600)
- Shanghai Pujiang Program (22PJ1406900)
- Startup Fund for Young Faculty at SJTU (SFYF at SJTU)
- Oceanic Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SL2022MS018)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (23ZR1431700)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University Scientific and Technological Innovation Funds (21X010200843)
- Science and Technology Innovation Key R&D Program of Chongqing (CSTB2022TIAD-STX0017)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein design, large language models, nanobodies, growth hormone, alkali resistance, thermal stability, binding affinity, affinity chromatography, protein engineering, industrial protein production
- MeSH terms
- Alkalies, Artificial Intelligence, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Protein Engineering, Protein Stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review