Effects of residue substitutions on the cellular abundance of proteins
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Multiplexed assays of variant effects (MAVEs) make it possible to measure the functional impact of all possible single amino acid residue substitutions in a protein in a single experiment. Combination of variant effect data from several such experiments provides the opportunity to conduct large-scale analyses of variant effect scores measured across proteins, but can be complicated by variations in the phenotypes that are probed across experiments. Thus, using variant effect datasets obtained with similar MAVE techniques can help reveal general rules governing the effects of amino acid variation for a single molecular phenotype. In this work, we accordingly combined data from six individual variant abundance by massively parallel sequencing (VAMP-seq) experiments and analysed a total of 31,614 variant effect scores reporting solely on the impact of single amino acid residue substitutions on the cellular abundance of proteins. Using our combined variant effect dataset, we derived and analysed a collection of amino acid substitution matrices describing the average impact on cellular abundance of all residue substitution types in different structural environments. We found that the substitution matrices predict the cellular abundance of protein variants with surprisingly high accuracy when given structural information only in the form of whether a residue is buried or exposed. We thus propose our substitution matrix-based predictions as strong baselines for future abundance model development.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science
Fowler, D. M., & Fields, S. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3027 · Cited by 1,287 · see citing works
Muñoz, V., & Serrano, L. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.0023 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Transfer learning to leverage larger datasets for improved prediction of protein stability changes
Dieckhaus, H., Brocidiacono, M., Randolph, N. Z., & Kuhlman, B. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314853121 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Rapid protein stability prediction using deep learning representations
Blaabjerg, L. M., Kassem, M. M., Good, L. L., Jonsson, N., Cagiada, M., Johansson, K. E., Boomsma, W., Stein, A., & Lindorff-Larsen, K. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.82593 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Schulze, T. K., & Lindorff-Larsen, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- The Linderstøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2026-05-28
- Volume
- 13
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402784649
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0033950)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- amino acid substitutions, protein abundance, substitution matrices, MAVE, protein structure, protein variants, abundance forecasting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review