Engineering cardiolipin binding to an artificial membrane protein reveals determinants for lipid-mediated stabilization
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Integral membrane proteins carry out essential functions in the cell, and their activities are often modulated by specific protein-lipid interactions in the membrane. Here, we elucidate the intricate role of cardiolipin (CDL), a regulatory lipid, as a stabilizer of membrane proteins and their complexes. Using the in silico-designed model protein TMHC4_R (ROCKET) as a scaffold, we employ a combination of molecular dynamics simulations and native mass spectrometry to explore the protein features that facilitate preferential lipid interactions and mediate stabilization. We find that the spatial arrangement of positively charged residues as well as local conformational flexibility are factors that distinguish stabilizing from non-stabilizing CDL interactions. However, we also find that even in this controlled, artificial system, a clear-cut distinction between binding and stabilization is difficult to attain, revealing that overlapping lipid contacts can partially compensate for the effects of binding site mutations. Extending our insights to naturally occurring proteins, we identify a stabilizing CDL site within the E. coli rhomboid intramembrane protease GlpG and uncover its regulatory influence on enzyme substrate preference. In this work, we establish a framework for engineering functional lipid interactions, paving the way for the design of proteins with membrane-specific properties or functions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Martini 3: A general purpose force field for coarse-grained molecular dynamics
Souza, P. C. T., Alessandri, R., Barnoud, J., Thallmair, S., Faustino, I., Grünewald, F., Patmanidis, I., Abdizadeh, H., Bruininks, B. M. H., Wassenaar, T. A., et al. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01098-3 · Cited by 1,551 · see citing works
A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675 · see citing works
CG2AT2: An enhanced fragment-based approach for serial multi-scale molecular dynamics simulations
Vickery, O. N., & Stansfeld, P. J. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00295 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Abramsson, M. L., Corey, R. A., Skerle, J. L., Persson, L. J., Anden, O., Oluwole, A. O., Howard, R. J., Lindahl, E., Robinson, C. V., Strisovsky, K., Marklund, E. G., Drew, D., Stansfeld, P. J., & Landreh, M.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Landreh, Michael
- ORCID
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2025-04-30
- Volume
- 14
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409986053
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet (2019-02433, 2019-01961, 2021-05806)
- Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning (Consolidator Grant)
- Medical Research Council (MR/V028839/1, MR/S009213/1)
- Wellcome Trust (10.35802/208361)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P01948X/1, BB/S003339/1, BB/Y003187/1)
- Howard Dalton Centre
- European Regional Development Fund (Operational Programme CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000729)
- Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (InterCOST programme (project no. LUC23180))
- Göran Gustafsson Foundation
- Sven och Lilly Lawskis Fond för Naturvetenskaplig Forskning
- Swedish Research Council (2020- 04825)
- Cancerfonden (22–2023 Pj)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- cardiolipin, protein-lipid interactions, membrane protein stabilization, positively charged residues, conformational flexibility, lipid binding sites, GlpG, Escherichia coli, substrate specificity, protein engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review