Cited by 21Protein Structure and DynamicsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research

Design of novel cyanovirin-N variants by modulation of binding dynamics through distal mutations

Open access
Kazan, I Can, Sharma, Prerna, Rahman, Mohammad Imtiazur, Bobkov, Andrey, Fromme, Raimund, Ghirlanda, Giovanna, Ozkan, S Banu·2022·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We develop integrated co-evolution and dynamic coupling (ICDC) approach to identify, mutate, and assess distal sites to modulate function. We validate the approach first by analyzing the existing mutational fitness data of TEM-1 β-lactamase and show that allosteric positions co-evolved and dynamically coupled with the active site significantly modulate function. We further apply ICDC approach to identify positions and their mutations that can modulate binding affinity in a lectin, cyanovirin-N (CV-N), that selectively binds to dimannose, and predict binding energies of its variants through Adaptive BP-Dock. Computational and experimental analyses reveal that binding enhancing mutants identified by ICDC impact the dynamics of the binding pocket, and show that rigidification of the binding residues compensates for the entropic cost of binding. This work suggests a mechanism by which distal mutations modulate function through dynamic allostery and provides a blueprint to identify candidates for mutagenesis in order to optimize protein function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.67474

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kazan, I. C., Sharma, P., Rahman, M. I., Bobkov, A., Fromme, R., Ghirlanda, G., & Ozkan, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ghirlanda, Giovanna
  • Ozkan, S Banu
Venue
eLife
Published
2022-12-06
Volume
11
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311549938
Cited by
21
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1715591)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (1901709)
  • National Institutes of Health (1R21CA207832-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Keywords
cyanovirin-N, distal mutations, dynamic allostery, TEM-1 beta-lactamase, binding energy prediction, protein mutagenesis
MeSH terms
Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review