Cited by 24Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The evolutionary history of human spindle genes includes back-and-forth gene flow with Neandertals

Open access
Peyrégne, Stéphane, Kelso, Janet, Peter, Benjamin M, Pääbo, Svante·2022·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Proteins associated with the spindle apparatus, a cytoskeletal structure that ensures the proper segregation of chromosomes during cell division, experienced an unusual number of amino acid substitutions in modern humans after the split from the ancestors of Neandertals and Denisovans. Here, we analyze the history of these substitutions and show that some of the genes in which they occur may have been targets of positive selection. We also find that the two changes in the kinetochore scaffold 1 (KNL1) protein, previously believed to be specific to modern humans, were present in some Neandertals. We show that the KNL1 gene of these Neandertals shared a common ancestor with present-day Africans about 200,000 years ago due to gene flow from the ancestors (or relatives) of modern humans into Neandertals. Subsequently, some non-Africans inherited this modern human-like gene variant from Neandertals, but none inherited the ancestral gene variants. These results add to the growing evidence of early contacts between modern humans and archaic groups in Eurasia and illustrate the intricate relationships among these groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.75464

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other more complex scenarios including a first introgression event from ancestors of modern humans into archaic humans followed by a second archaic introgression event into non-Africans and back to Africa migrations cannot be discarded.

    “Similarly, we cannot discard other more complex scenarios including a first introgression event from the ancestors of modern humans into archaic humans followed by a second archaic introgression event into non-Africans and back to Africa migrations, as similarly suggested to explain the finding of Neanderthal introgression sequences in the 1000 GP African populations or the presence of a putative”

    From Human genetic adaptation related to cellular zinc homeostasis (2023) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results sections on KNL1 introgression into Neandertals and reintroduction into non-Africans support the proposed two-step gene-flow scenario. Our copy does not connect that scenario to back-to-Africa migration or Neandertal-introgressed sequences in African populations. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 24

Authors
Peyrégne, S., Kelso, J., Peter, B. M., & Pääbo, S.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Peyrégne, Stéphane
  • Pääbo, Svante
Venue
eLife
Published
2022-07-11
Volume
11
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285018310
Cited by
24
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
27.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Max Planck Society
  • European Research Council (694707)
  • NOMIS Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
human evolution, Neanderthals, Denisovans, kinetochore, KNL1, gene flow, positive selection, amino acid substitutions, archaic human admixture, chromosome segregation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Humans, Hominidae, Black People, Gene Flow, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review