Cited by 6Cellular transport and secretionLipid metabolism and biosynthesisSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling

Membrane contact sites regulate vacuolar fission via sphingolipid metabolism

Open access
Hanaoka, Kazuki, Nishikawa, Kensuke, Ikeda, Atsuko, Schlarmann, Philipp, Sasaki, Saku, Fujii, Sotaro, Yamashita, Sayumi, Nakaji, Aya +1 more·2024·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Membrane contact sites (MCSs) are junctures that perform important roles including coordinating lipid metabolism. Previous studies have indicated that vacuolar fission/fusion processes are coupled with modifications in the membrane lipid composition. However, it has been still unclear whether MCS-mediated lipid metabolism controls the vacuolar morphology. Here, we report that deletion of tricalbins (Tcb1, Tcb2, and Tcb3), tethering proteins at endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–plasma membrane (PM) and ER–Golgi contact sites, alters fusion/fission dynamics and causes vacuolar fragmentation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . In addition, we show that the sphingolipid precursor phytosphingosine (PHS) accumulates in tricalbin-deleted cells, triggering the vacuolar division. Detachment of the nucleus–vacuole junction (NVJ), an important contact site between the vacuole and the perinuclear ER, restored vacuolar morphology in both cells subjected to high exogenous PHS and Tcb3-deleted cells, supporting that PHS transport across the NVJ induces vacuole division. Thus, our results suggest that vacuolar morphology is maintained by MCSs through the metabolism of sphingolipids.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.89938

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hanaoka, K., Nishikawa, K., Ikeda, A., Schlarmann, P., Sasaki, S., Fujii, S., Yamashita, S., Nakaji, A., & Funato, K.
Affiliations
Hiroshima University (JP)
Corresponding author
Funato, Kouichi
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-03-27
Volume
12
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385281681
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K20572, 22K14863, 19H02922, 21K19088)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Keywords
membrane contact sites, vacuole fusion, sphingolipid metabolism, phytosphingosine, nucleus-vacuole junction, vacuolar morphology, lipid metabolism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Cell Membrane, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sphingolipids, Vacuoles, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Lipid Metabolism, Mitochondrial Membranes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review