Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 0Ion channel regulation and functionCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasIon Transport and Channel Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LRMP inhibits cAMP potentiation of HCN4 channels by disrupting intramolecular signal transduction

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.92411.3

Abstract

Abstract Lymphoid restricted membrane protein (LRMP) is a specific regulator of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-sensitive isoform 4 (HCN4) channel. LRMP prevents cAMP-dependent potentiation of HCN4 but the interaction domains, mechanisms of action, and basis for isoform-specificity remain unknown. Here we identify the domains of LRMP essential for regulation. We show that LRMP acts by disrupting the intramolecular signal transduction between cyclic nucleotide binding and gating. And we demonstrate that multiple unique regions in HCN4 are required for LRMP isoform-specificity. Using patch clamp electrophysiology and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), we showed that the initial 227 residues of LRMP and the N-terminus of HCN4 are necessary for LRMP to interact with HCN4. We found that the HCN4 N-terminus and HCN4-specific residues in the C-linker are necessary for regulation of HCN4 by LRMP. And we demonstrate that LRMP-regulation can be conferred to HCN2 by addition of the HCN4 N-terminus along with mutation of 5 residues in the S5 region and C-linker to the cognate HCN4 residues. Taken together, these results suggest that LRMP inhibits HCN4 through an isoform-specific interaction involving the N-terminals of both proteins that prevents the transduction of cAMP binding into a change in channel gating via an HCN4-specific orientation of the N-terminus, C-linker, and S4-S5 linker.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.92411.2

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Metadata

Authors
Peters, C. H., Singh, R. K., Langley, A. A., Nichols, W. G., Ferris, H. R., Jeffrey, D. A., Proenza, C., & Bankston, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-04-10
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394692059
Cited by
0
References
39
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
eLife (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM137912, R01GM140004)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL088427)
  • American Heart Association (830889, 19POST34380777)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
Keywords
HCN4, HCN2, cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, channel gating, intramolecular signal transduction, isoform specificity, protein-protein interaction, C-linker, S4-S5 linker, hyperpolarization-activated channels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LRMP inhibits cAMP potentiation of HCN4 channels by disrupting intramolecular signal transduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7554/elife.92411.2
The paper
Peters, C. H., Singh, R. K., Langley, A. A., Nichols, W. G., Ferris, H. R., Jeffrey, D. A., Proenza, C., & Bankston, J. R. (2024). LRMP inhibits cAMP potentiation of HCN4 channels by disrupting intramolecular signal transduction. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.92411.2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.