Cited by 23Connexins and lens biologyIon channel regulation and functionProtein Structure and Dynamics

Structures of wild-type and a constitutively closed mutant of connexin26 shed light on channel regulation by CO2

Open access
Brotherton, Deborah H, Nijjar, Sarbjit, Savva, Christos G, Dale, Nicholas, Cameron, Alexander David·2024·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Connexins allow intercellular communication by forming gap junction channels (GJCs) between juxtaposed cells. Connexin26 (Cx26) can be regulated directly by CO 2 . This is proposed to be mediated through carbamylation of K125. We show that mutating K125 to glutamate, mimicking the negative charge of carbamylation, causes Cx26 GJCs to be constitutively closed. Through cryo-EM we observe that the K125E mutation pushes a conformational equilibrium towards the channel having a constricted pore entrance, similar to effects seen on raising the partial pressure of CO 2 . In previous structures of connexins, the cytoplasmic loop, important in regulation and where K125 is located, is disordered. Through further cryo-EM studies we trap distinct states of Cx26 and observe density for the cytoplasmic loop. The interplay between the position of this loop, the conformations of the transmembrane helices and the position of the N-terminal helix, which controls the aperture to the pore, provides a mechanism for regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.93686

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Brotherton, D. H., Nijjar, S., Savva, C. G., Dale, N., & Cameron, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Dale, Nicholas
  • Cameron, Alexander David
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-06-03
Volume
13
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399300959
Cited by
23
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2015-090)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P010393/1, MC_PC_17136)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
connexin 26, gap junction channels, carbon dioxide regulation, carbamoylation, cytoplasmic loop, pore conformation, channel gating, transmembrane helices, N-terminal helix, intercellular communication
MeSH terms
Connexin 26, Carbon Dioxide, Humans, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Gap Junctions, Connexins, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review