PPIscreenML is a method for structure-based screening of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.98179.2
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions underlie nearly all cellular processes. With the advent of protein structure prediction methods such as AlphaFold2 (AF2), models of specific protein pairs can be built extremely accurately in most cases. However, determining the relevance of a given protein pair remains an open question. It is presently unclear how to use best structure-based tools to infer whether a pair of candidate proteins indeed interacts with one another: ideally, one might even use such information to screen among candidate pairings to build up protein interaction networks. Whereas methods for evaluating quality of modeled protein complexes have been co-opted for determining which pairings interact (e.g. pDockQ and iPTM), there have been no rigorously benchmarked methods for this task. Here, we introduce PPIscreenML, a classification model trained to distinguish AF2 models of interacting protein pairs from AF2 models of compelling decoy pairings. We find that PPIscreenML outperforms methods such as pDockQ and iPTM for this task, and further that PPIscreenML exhibits impressive performance when identifying which ligand/receptor pairings engage one another across the structurally conserved tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF). Analysis of benchmark results using complexes not seen in PPIscreenML development strongly suggests that the model generalizes beyond training data, making it broadly applicable for identifying new protein complexes based on structural models built with AF2.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Broad availability of AlphaFold2 (AF2) ( Jumper et al., 2021 ), especially through the ColabFold framework ( Mirdita et al., 2022 ), has provided the research community with unprecedented access to structural information for monomeric proteins, in many cases at resolution comparable to…”
Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
Lu, H., Zhou, Q., He, J., Jiang, Z., Peng, C., Tong, R., & Shi, J. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00315-3 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Deciphering molecular interactions by proximity labeling
Qin, W., Cho, K. F., Cavanagh, P. E., & Ting, A. Y. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01010-5 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Affinity-purification coupled to mass spectrometry: basic principles and strategies
Dunham, W. H., Mullin, M., & Gingras, A. (2012) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201100523 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Towards a structurally resolved human protein interaction network
Burke, D. F., Bryant, P., Barrio-Hernandez, I., Memon, D., Pozzati, G., Shenoy, A., Zhu, W., Dunham, A. S., Albanese, P., Keller, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00910-8 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
In silico protein interaction screening uncovers DONSON’s role in replication initiation
Lim, Y., Tamayo-Orrego, L., Schmid, E., Tarnauskaite, Z., Kochenova, O. V., Gruar, R., Muramatsu, S., Lynch, L., Schlie, A. V., Carroll, P. L., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adi3448 · Cited by 112 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…– which range from predicting protein quaternary structures to defining biological functions of peptides and intrinsically disordered regions ( Lim et al., 2023 ; Bret et al., 2024 ; Danneskiold-Samsøe et al., 2023 ; Marciano et al., 2022 ; Martin, 2024 ; Teufel et al., 2023 ; Pogozheva et…”
From interaction networks to interfaces, scanning intrinsically disordered regions using AlphaFold2
Bret, H., Gao, J., Zea, D. J., Andreani, J., & Guerois, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44288-7 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Mischley, V., Maier, J., Chen, J., & Karanicolas, J.
- Affiliations
- Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
- Triana Biomedicines
- Corresponding author
- Karanicolas, John
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2026-04-21
- Volume
- 13
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10979958
- OpenAlex
- W4392895562
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (R01GM141513, F30EB034594, P30CA006927)
- National Science Foundation (MCB130049)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, AlphaFold2, structure-based screening, protein complex prediction, protein-protein interaction network, tumor necrosis factor superfamily, ligand-receptor interactions, benchmarking, model generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review