Cited by 8Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

PPIscreenML is a method for structure-based screening of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold

Open access
Mischley, Victoria, Maier, Johannes, Chen, Jesse, Karanicolas, John·2026·eLife

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.98179.2

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions underlie nearly all cellular processes. With the advent of protein structure prediction methods such as AlphaFold2 (AF2), models of specific protein pairs can be built extremely accurately in most cases. However, determining the relevance of a given protein pair remains an open question. It is presently unclear how to use best structure-based tools to infer whether a pair of candidate proteins indeed interacts with one another: ideally, one might even use such information to screen among candidate pairings to build up protein interaction networks. Whereas methods for evaluating quality of modeled protein complexes have been co-opted for determining which pairings interact (e.g. pDockQ and iPTM), there have been no rigorously benchmarked methods for this task. Here, we introduce PPIscreenML, a classification model trained to distinguish AF2 models of interacting protein pairs from AF2 models of compelling decoy pairings. We find that PPIscreenML outperforms methods such as pDockQ and iPTM for this task, and further that PPIscreenML exhibits impressive performance when identifying which ligand/receptor pairings engage one another across the structurally conserved tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF). Analysis of benchmark results using complexes not seen in PPIscreenML development strongly suggests that the model generalizes beyond training data, making it broadly applicable for identifying new protein complexes based on structural models built with AF2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.98179

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Mischley, V., Maier, J., Chen, J., & Karanicolas, J.
Affiliations
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
  • Triana Biomedicines
Corresponding author
Karanicolas, John
Venue
eLife
Published
2026-04-21
Volume
13
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392895562
Cited by
8
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM141513, F30EB034594, P30CA006927)
  • National Science Foundation (MCB130049)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, AlphaFold2, structure-based screening, protein complex prediction, protein-protein interaction network, tumor necrosis factor superfamily, ligand-receptor interactions, benchmarking, model generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review