Correlates and changes in empathy and attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration in osteopathic medical students
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Many studies have reported a decline in empathy as allopathic medical students progress through medical school. Data are needed to compare the pattern of changes in empathy in osteopathic and allopathic medical students. Also, it is important to investigate the associations between measures of empathy and attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration, which are among major elements of professionalism in medicine. OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate correlations between empathy and interprofessional collaboration in osteopathic medical students; (2) to examine differences in empathy and interprofessional collaboration scores by sex, class year, and specialty interest; and (3) to compare empathy scores by class year between osteopathic and allopathic medical students. DESIGN: Correlational and comparative study. SETTING: Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Osteopathic medical students enrolled in academic year 2011-2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) and the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration (JSAPNC) scores. RESULTS: Student respondents (N=373) included 197 women (53%) and 176 men (47%). Significant correlation was found between scores on the JSE and JSAPNC (r=0.42, P<.01). Women scored higher than men on the JSE (mean scores, 117.1 and 111.9, respectively; F1,371=19.6, P<.01) and the JSAPNC (mean scores, 50.1 and 48.7, respectively; F1,371=6.5, P<.01). No statistically significant difference on the scores of the 2 scales was observed among students who planned to pursue "people-oriented" specialties (150 [40%]) compared with those interested in "technology/procedure-oriented" specialties (170 [45%]). No statistically significant change in empathy scores was found in different class years of the osteopathic medical students. Comparisons of empathy scores with allopathic medical students showed no significant difference in the first and second years, but osteopathic medical students had a higher mean empathy score (M=114.4) than their allopathic counterparts (M=110.9) in the third year (t158=2.31, P<.05), and their empathy scores remained high, although not statistically significant, in the fourth year of osteopathic medical school. CONCLUSION: The decline in empathy that is often reported among allopathic medical students was not observed. The present study can serve as a step toward further longitudinal research on the development of empathy and attitudes toward teamwork among osteopathic medical students.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another study of self-reported empathy found a significant difference in favor of osteopathic medical students, but only among third-year students in comparison with an externally acquired control group.
“Alternatively, another study of selfreported empathy found a significant difference in favor of osteopathic medical students, 4 but only among thirdyear students in comparison with an externally acquired control group.5”
Comparative studies of empathy have focused on osteopathic and allopathic medical students.
“Comparative studies of empathy have focused on osteopathic and allopathic medical students.”
Studies of medical student empathy are limited by self-assessment, non-generalizable single-institution comparisons, and lack of measures reflecting actual patient encounters with practicing physicians.
“Such studies of medical student empathy are limited in several important ways: they measure only the student's self-assessment of empathy; the comparisons involve students from single osteopathic and allopathic institutions that are not generalizable to the broader populations of osteopathic and allopathic medical students; and they do not provide measures of empathy that reflect actual patient En”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 51 Berwick D Davidoff F Hiatt H Smith R . Refining and implementing the Tavistock principles for everybody in health care. BMJ. 2001;323(7313):616-620.10.1136/bmj.323.7313.616Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central · DOI
- 53 Jose PE . The role of gender and gender role similarity in readers' identification with story characters. Sex Roles. 1989;21(9-10):697-713.10.1007/BF00289178Search in Google Scholar · DOI
- 54 Hojat M Gonnella JS Veloski J . Rebuttals to critics of studies of decline of empathy [letter]. Acad Med.2010;85(12):1812. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181fa3576.10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181fa3576Search in Google Scholar PubMed · DOI
- Authors
- Calabrese, L. H., Bianco, J. A., Mann, D., Massello, D., & Hojat, M.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2013-12-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 898-907
- ISSN
- 2702-3648 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122458735
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Osteopathic Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Medicine, Boston University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- empathy, interprofessional collaboration, osteopathic medical students, Jefferson Scale of Empathy, gender differences, specialty interest, professionalism, nurse-physician collaboration, medical education outcomes, attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cooperative Behavior, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Medicine, Ohio, Osteopathic Medicine, Physician-Patient Relations, Population Surveillance, Sex Factors, Students, Medical, Physician-Nurse Relations, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review