The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seven Interpretive Essays on Peruvian Reality
Abstract
Once again I repeat that I am not an impartial; objective critic. My judgments are nourished by my ideals, my sentiments, my passions. I have an avowed and resolute ambition: to assist in the creation of Peruvian socialism. I am far removed from the academic techniques of the university. —From the Author's Note Jose Carlos Mariátegui was one of the leading South American social philosophers of the early twentieth century. He identified the future of Peru with the welfare of the Indian at a time when similar ideas were beginning to develop in Middle America and the Andean region. Generations of Peruvian and other Latin American social thinkers have been profoundly influenced by his writings. Seven Interpretive Essays on Peruvian Reality (Siete ensayos de interpretación de la realidad peruana), first published in 1928, is Mariátegui's major statement of his position and has gone into many editions, not only in Peru but also in other Latin American countries. The topics discussed in the essays—economic evolution, the problem of the Indian, the land problem, public education, the religious factor, regionalism and centralism, and the literary process—are in many respects as relevant today as when the book was written. Mariátegui's thinking was strongly tinged with Marxism. Because contemporary sociology, anthropology, and economics have been influenced by Marxism much more in Latin America than in North America, it is important that North Americans become more aware of Mariátegui's position and accord it its proper historical significance. Jorge Basadre, the distinguished Peruvian historian, in an introduction written especially for this translation, provides an account of Mariátegui's life and describes the political and intellectual climate in which these essays were written.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Post-Colonial Studies Reader
Bose, B., Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1996) · World Literature Today · doi:10.2307/40152289 · Cited by 2,150
Ecological Imperialism and the Global Metabolic Rift
Clark, B., & Foster, J. B. (2009) · International Journal of Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1177/0020715209105144 · Cited by 299
Modes of Production in a Materialist Conception of History
Banaji, J. (1977) · Capital & Class · doi:10.1177/030981687700300102 · Cited by 227
Political Ecology: a Latin American Perspective
Leff, E. (2015) · Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente · doi:10.5380/dma.v35i0.44381 · Cited by 201
The Gaze of the Other: Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis
Prasad, A. (2003) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781403982292_1 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Mariátegui, J. C.
- Venue
- University of Texas Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Texas Press
- Published
- 1971-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2163169562
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Texas Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
- Keywords
- José Carlos Mariátegui, Marxism, Indian question, indigenous peoples, land issues, public education, religion, literary process, economic development, Latin American social thought, Jorge Basadre
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review