The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The History of the Incas
Abstract
The History of the Incas may be the best description of Inca life and mythology to survive Spanish colonization of Peru. Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa, a well-educated sea captain and cosmographer of the viceroyalty, wrote the document in Cuzco, the capital of the Inca Empire, just forty years after the arrival of the first Spaniards. The royal sponsorship of the work guaranteed Sarmiento direct access to the highest Spanish officials in Cuzco. It allowed him to summon influential Incas, especially those who had witnessed the fall of the Empire. Sarmiento also traveled widely and interviewed numerous local lords (curacas), as well as surviving members of the royal Inca families. Once completed, in an unprecedented effort to establish the authenticity of the work, Sarmiento's manuscript was read, chapter by chapter, to forty-two indigenous authorities for commentary and correction. The scholars behind this new edition (the first to be published in English since 1907) went to similarly great lengths in pursuit of accuracy. Translators Brian Bauer and Vania Smith used an early transcript and, in some instances, the original document to create the text. Bauer and Jean-Jacques Decoster's introduction lays bare the biases Sarmiento incorporated into his writing. It also theorizes what sources, in addition to his extensive interviews, Sarmiento relied upon to produce his history. Finally, more than sixty new illustrations enliven this historically invaluable document of life in the anci…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The traditional chronology of the Inca Empire is primarily based on the three Spanish accounts of Inca oral history that included chronological information: Cabello Balboa (1945), Betanzos (1987), and Sarmiento de Gamboa (2007).”
From Dating the expansion of the inca empire: bayesian models from Ecuador and Argentina (2017) · cites this paper as Sarmiento de Gamboa (2007)
In the citing paper
“Only two other chroniclers proposed absolute dates for the Inca, most notably Sarmiento de Gamboa (2007), who offers an unrealistic chronology based on a subjective and eclectic mix of dates from the Bible, Greek texts, the Spanish royal line, and interviews (González Díaz 2015: 170-3).”
From Dating the expansion of the inca empire: bayesian models from Ecuador and Argentina (2017) · cites this paper as Sarmiento de Gamboa 2007
In the citing paper
“Most historical accounts, including chronicles whose authors gathered most of their evidence from Cuzco sources (e.g.Betanzos 1987; Sarmiento de Gamboa 2007) and others who had first-hand experience in Ecuador (Cabello Balboa 1945;Cieza de León 1985), agree that the southern highlands of Ecuador were conquered by Topa Inca during the reign of Pachacuti.”
From Reconceiving the chronology of inca imperial expansion (2012) · cites this paper as Sarmiento de Gamboa 2007
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dating the expansion of the inca empire: bayesian models from Ecuador and Argentina
Marsh, E. J., Kidd, R., Ogburn, D., & Durán, V. (2017) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2016.118 · Cited by 144
Reconceiving the chronology of inca imperial expansion
Ogburn, D. E. (2012) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.v54i2.16014 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarmiento de Gamboa, P.
- Publisher
- University of Texas Press
- Published
- 2007-12-31
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review