Relative Ion Gauge Sensitivities to Various Hydrocarbon Gases
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The gauge sensitivity strongly depends on the ionization probability of the calibration gas.
“The gauge sensitivity strongly depends on the ionization probability of the calibration gas.”
From Review Article: Recommended practice for calibrating vacuum gauges of the ionization type (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
The Introduction (p. 2) says gauge sensitivity depends greatly on the nature of the gas, but does not attribute that dependence to ionization probability. In Results and Discussion (p. 5), the authors instead consider ionization probability to be nearly similar across gases and report that relative sensitivity increases linearly with molecular cross section. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [1]S. Dushman and J. M. Lafferty: Scientific Foundations of Vacuum Technique (John Wiley, 1962) p. 321.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review Article: Recommended practice for calibrating vacuum gauges of the ionization type
Fedchak, J. A., Abbott, P. J., Hendricks, J. H., Arnold, P. C., & Peacock, N. T. (2018) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films · doi:10.1116/1.5025060 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nakayama, K., & Hojo, H.
- Venue
- Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1974-01-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 113
- ISSN
- 0021-4922
- 1347-4065
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
