The Myth of the Powerless State
Abstract
Conventional wisdom argues that the integration of the world economy is making national governments less powerful, but Linda Weiss disagrees. In an era when global society and the transnational market are trendy concepts, she suggests that state capacities for domestic transformative strategies provide a competitive advantage. Some of the most successful economies rely on state-informed and state-embedded institutions for governing the economy. In fact, she contends, the strength of external economic pressures is largely determined domestically, and the effect of such pressures varies with the strength of domestic institutions. Weiss analyzes the sources and varieties of state capacity for governing industrial transformation in contemporary cases: the unraveling of Sweden's distributive model of adjustment, the evolution of developmental states in Northeast Asia, and the parallel strengths of the German and Japanese systems of industrial coordination. Her comparative perspective allows her to show how different types of state capacity affect industrial vitality and domestic adjustment to global forces. As economic integration proceeds, she concludes, state capabilities will matter more rather than less in fostering social well-being and the creation of wealth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Implicitly or explicitly the developmental state theory compares the East Asian cases to the neoliberal model, or Washington Consensus.
“Implicitly or explicitly the theory compares the East Asian cases to the neoliberal model, or Washington Consensus (Weiss, 1998).”
From The Developmental State: Dead or Alive? (2018) · cites this paper as Weiss, 1998
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 1,466
- Authors
- Weiss, L.
- Corresponding author
- Weiss, Linda
- ORCID
- Weiss, Linda
- Venue
- Cornell University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cornell University Press
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2026730010
- Cited by
- 1,466
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 130.78
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cornell University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Asian Industrial and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- state capacity, economic integration, industrial transformation, developmental state, industrial policy, comparative institutional analysis, Sweden, Northeast Asia, Germany, Japan, social well-being, wealth creation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review