Cited by 39Gaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceMathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

Detecting periodicities with Gaussian processes

Open access
Durrande, Nicolas, Hensman, James, Rattray, Magnus, Lawrence, Neil D.·2016·PeerJ Computer Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We consider the problem of detecting and quantifying the periodic component of a function given noise-corrupted observations of a limited number of input/output tuples. Our approach is based on Gaussian process regression, which provides a flexible non-parametric framework for modelling periodic data. We introduce a novel decomposition of the covariance function as the sum of periodic and aperiodic kernels. This decomposition allows for the creation of sub-models which capture the periodic nature of the signal and its complement. To quantify the periodicity of the signal, we derive a periodicity ratio which reflects the uncertainty in the fitted sub-models. Although the method can be applied to many kernels, we give a special emphasis to the Matérn family, from the expression of the reproducing kernel Hilbert space inner product to the implementation of the associated periodic kernels in a Gaussian process toolkit. The proposed method is illustrated by considering the detection of periodically expressed genes in the arabidopsis genome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj-cs.50

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SpatialDE is related to and generalizes previous approaches for detecting temporal and periodic gene expression patterns in time series.

    “SpatialDE is related to and generalizes previous approaches for detecting temporal19 and periodic gene expression patterns20 in time series.”

    From SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes (2018) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durrande, N., Hensman, J., Rattray, M., & Lawrence, N. D.
Affiliations
  • Mines Saint-Étienne (FR)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
PeerJ Computer Science
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2016-04-13
Volume
2
Pages
e50
ISSN
2376-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2276506965
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • BioPreDynProject (Ref 289434)
  • BBSRC (BB/1004769/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
periodicity detection, Gaussian process regression, Matérn kernel, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, periodic gene expression, Arabidopsis thaliana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review