Detecting periodicities with Gaussian processes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We consider the problem of detecting and quantifying the periodic component of a function given noise-corrupted observations of a limited number of input/output tuples. Our approach is based on Gaussian process regression, which provides a flexible non-parametric framework for modelling periodic data. We introduce a novel decomposition of the covariance function as the sum of periodic and aperiodic kernels. This decomposition allows for the creation of sub-models which capture the periodic nature of the signal and its complement. To quantify the periodicity of the signal, we derive a periodicity ratio which reflects the uncertainty in the fitted sub-models. Although the method can be applied to many kernels, we give a special emphasis to the Matérn family, from the expression of the reproducing kernel Hilbert space inner product to the implementation of the associated periodic kernels in a Gaussian process toolkit. The proposed method is illustrated by considering the detection of periodically expressed genes in the arabidopsis genome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SpatialDE is related to and generalizes previous approaches for detecting temporal and periodic gene expression patterns in time series.
“SpatialDE is related to and generalizes previous approaches for detecting temporal19 and periodic gene expression patterns20 in time series.”
From SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes (2018) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Spline Models for Observational Data
Wahba, G. (1990) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970128 · Cited by 4,184 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes
Svensson, V., Teichmann, S. A., & Stegle, O. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4636 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
- Authors
- Durrande, N., Hensman, J., Rattray, M., & Lawrence, N. D.
- Affiliations
- Mines Saint-Étienne (FR)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Venue
- PeerJ Computer Science
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2016-04-13
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- e50
- ISSN
- 2376-5992 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2276506965
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PeerJ Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- BioPreDynProject (Ref 289434)
- BBSRC (BB/1004769/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Keywords
- periodicity detection, Gaussian process regression, Matérn kernel, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, periodic gene expression, Arabidopsis thaliana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review