On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature

Vasilevsky, Nicole A., Brush, Matthew H., Paddock, Holly, Ponting, Laura, Tripathy, Shreejoy J., LaRocca, Gregory M., Haendel, Melissa A.·2013·PeerJ
DOI 10.7717/peerj.148

Cited by (275)

Items 201–275 of 275

  1. Letter to the editor: A call for transparency in immunoassay techniques to enhance rigor and reproducibility
    Elizabeth Anne Shirtcliff, Wen Wang, Shannin N. Moody, Jesse D. Smith, Julian G. Simmons · 2019 · Developmental Psychobiology
  2. Indexing
    William Hersh · 2020 · Health informatics
  3. Semantic Support for Recording Laboratory Experimental Metadata: A Study in Food Chemistry
    Dena Tahvildari · 2015 · Lecture notes in computer science
  4. Cell-Line Annotation on Europe PubMed Central
    2014 · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  5. Dedifferentiation and redifferentiation of canine articular chondrocytes
    Jasmine Penny · 2015 · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham)
  6. The Economics of Reproducibility in
    Leonard P. Freedman, Iain Cockburn, Timothy S. Simcoe · 2015
  7. Peer Review #1 of "Indicators for the use of robotic labs in basic biomedical research: a literature analysis (v0.1)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  8. Peer Review #2 of "Indicators for the use of robotic labs in basic biomedical research: a literature analysis (v0.1)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  9. A survey on information sources used by academic researchers to evaluate scientific instruments
    Carsten Bergenholtz, Samuel C. MacAulay, Christos Kolympiris, Inge Seim · 2018 · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  10. Pragmatic statistical issues in biological research: Introduction to special series
    Robert S. Danziger, Michael L. Berbaum · 2018 · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  11. Peer Review #2 of "A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences (v0.1)"
    2018 · PeerJ
  12. Peer Review #4 of "A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences (v0.2)"
    2018 · PeerJ
  13. Peer Review #1 of "A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences (v0.1)"
    2018 · PeerJ
  14. Peer Review #3 of "A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences (v0.1)"
    2018 · PeerJ
  15. Investigating the Role of Genomic Variation in Susceptibility to Environmental Chemicals across Populations
    Lindsay A. Holden · 2000
  16. Peer Review #2 of "Indicators for the use of robotic labs in basic biomedical research: a literature analysis (v0.2)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  17. Peer Review #1 of "A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences (v0.2)"
    2018 · PeerJ
  18. Peer Review #1 of "Indicators for the use of robotic labs in basic biomedical research: a literature analysis (v0.2)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  19. The Unclear Meaning of Open Scientific Data
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  20. Legal Issues Arising in Open Scientific Data
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  21. Open Sharing of Clinical Trial Data
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  22. The Case for Open Scientific Data: Theory, Benefits, Costs and Opportunities
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  23. Introduction: Opening Up Data in Scientific Research
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  24. SeMAntic RepresenTation for experimental Protocols
    Olga Ximena Giraldo Pasmín · 2019
  25. Conclusion: Towards Achievable and Sustainable Open Scientific Data
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  26. Peer Review #1 of "The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation (v0.1)"
    2020 · PeerJ
  27. Peer Review #2 of "The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation (v0.1)"
    2020 · PeerJ
  28. Peer Review #2 of "The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation (v0.2)"
    2020 · PeerJ
  29. sits.rep: Pesquisa Reprodutível em Classificações de Uso e Cobertura da Terra
    Rafael Mariano, Gilberto Ribeiro de Queiroz, Pedro Andrade, Rafael M. Santos · 2020 · Anais do Workshop de Computação Aplicada à Gestão do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais (WCAMA)
  30. Peer Review #1 of "Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: the OpenPREDICT use case (v0.1)"
    2020 · PeerJ Computer Science
  31. Bereichsethiken im Überblick
    Micha H. Werner · 2020 · J.B. Metzler eBooks
  32. The Solution to Science's Replication Crisis
    Bruce Knuteson · 2016 · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
  33. Multiple-Study Replication Initiatives
    R. Barker Bausell · 2021 · Oxford University Press eBooks
  34. Next Steps – Continuity After Going Digital
    Klemen Zupančič · 2021
  35. FAIR and bias-free network modules for mechanism-based disease redefinitions
    Ahmed Hassan · 2021
  36. Identification failure
    2013 · Nature
  37. Glossary
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  38. Appendix A
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  39. Acknowledgements
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  40. Bibliography
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  41. Foreword
    Marco Ricolfi · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  42. Abstract
    Vera Lipton · 2020 · IntechOpen eBooks
  43. Peer Review #1 of "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications (v0.1)"
    2015 · PeerJ Computer Science
  44. Peer Review #2 of "Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: the OpenPREDICT use case (v0.1)"
    2020 · PeerJ Computer Science
  45. Peer Review #2 of "Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: the OpenPREDICT use case (v0.2)"
    2020 · PeerJ Computer Science
  46. Peer Review #3 of "The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation (v0.1)"
    2020 · PeerJ
  47. Peer Review #3 of "Indicators for the use of robotic labs in basic biomedical research: a literature analysis (v0.1)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  48. Peer Review #1 of "The health care and life sciences community profile for dataset descriptions (v0.2)"
    2016 · PeerJ
  49. Peer Review #3 of "Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? (v0.1)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  50. Peer Review #2 of "Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? (v0.1)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  51. Peer Review #3 of "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications (v0.1)"
    2015 · PeerJ Computer Science
  52. Access
    William Hersh · 2020 · Health informatics
  53. Peer Review #1 of "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications (v0.2)"
    2015 · PeerJ Computer Science
  54. Peer Review #3 of "Indicators for the use of robotic labs in basic biomedical research: a literature analysis (v0.2)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  55. Peer Review #2 of "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications (v0.1)"
    2015 · PeerJ Computer Science
  56. Peer Review #1 of "The health care and life sciences community profile for dataset descriptions (v0.1)"
    2016 · PeerJ
  57. Peer Review #2 of "The health care and life sciences community profile for dataset descriptions (v0.2)"
    2016 · PeerJ
  58. Peer Review #3 of "The health care and life sciences community profile for dataset descriptions (v0.1)"
    2016 · PeerJ
  59. Peer Review #3 of "Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? (v0.2)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  60. Peer Review #1 of "Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? (v0.2)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  61. Peer Review #1 of "Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? (v0.1)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  62. Peer Review #3 of "The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation (v0.2)"
    2020 · PeerJ
  63. Peer Review #2 of "The health care and life sciences community profile for dataset descriptions (v0.1)"
    2016 · PeerJ
  64. Peer Review #2 of "Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? (v0.2)"
    2017 · PeerJ
  65. MDAR (Material, Design, Analysis Reporting): A Modular Framework for Transparent Reporting in the Life Sciences
    Véronique Kiermer · 2022 · Editorial Office News
  66. How to Mitigate Unintentional Misconduct with Samples and Data in Biorepositories
    Daniel Simeon‐Dubach, Zisis Kozlakidis · 2022 · Springer eBooks
  67. Osteopathie und evidenzbasierte Medizin, Teil 2: Kritik an der EBM
    Dirk Luthin · 2024 · DO - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Osteopathie
  68. Use of Antibodies in the Research on Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes
    Wisuit Pradidarcheep, Vichununt Kerdput, Martin Christian Michel · 2024 · Neuromethods
  69. Predicting the longevity of resources shared in scientific publications
    Daniel Ernesto Acuna, Jian Jian, Tong Zeng, Lizhen Liang, Han Zhuang · 2025 · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  70. Rigor in Experimental Design in Nonregulated Preclinical Research in Neuroscience Drug Discovery
    Sara Steele, Anton Bespalov, Elisabeth M. C. Dequeker · 2025 · Wiley eBooks
  71. How should we address non-reproducibility?
    Torben Göpel · 2026 · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  72. FAIRsharing record for: Standards for Reporting Enzymology Data Guidelines
    FAIRsharing Team, Carsten Kettner · 2015 · FAIRsharing.org
  73. FAIRsharing record for: Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval Workbench
    FAIRsharing Team, John Graybeal · 2018 · FAIRsharing.org
  74. FAIRsharing record for: Minimal Information about MHC Multimers
    FAIRsharing Team, Randi Vita, Randi Vita · 2022 · FAIRsharing.org
  75. FAIRsharing record for: Standards for Reporting Enzymology Data Database
    FAIRsharing Team, Carsten Kettner, Carsten Kettner · 2018 · FAIRsharing.org