Fine-tuning protein language models unlocks the potential of underrepresented viral proteomes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein language models (pLMs) have revolutionized computational biology by generating rich protein vector representations, or embeddings—enabling major advancements in de novo protein design, structure prediction, variant effect analysis, and evolutionary studies. Despite these breakthroughs, current pLMs often exhibit biases against proteins from underrepresented species, with viral proteins being particularly affected, frequently referred to as the “dark matter” of the biological world due to their vast diversity and ubiquity, yet sparse representation in training datasets. Here, we show that fine-tuning pre-trained pLMs on viral protein sequences, using diverse learning frameworks and parameter-efficient strategies, significantly enhances representation quality and improves performance on downstream tasks. To support further research, we provide source code for fine-tuning pLMs and benchmarking embedding quality. By enabling more accurate modeling of viral proteins, our approach advances tools for understanding viral biology, combating emerging infectious diseases, and driving biotechnological innovation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Sawhney, R., Ferrell, B. D., Dejean, T., Schreiber, Z., Harrigan, W., Polson, S. W., Wommack, K. E., & Belcaid, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Delaware Biotechnology Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Belcaid, Mahdi
- ORCID
- Venue
- PeerJ
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2025-09-18
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- e19919
- ISSN
- 2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12450373
- OpenAlex
- W4414337601
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1736030, 2025567)
- Delaware INBRE (NIH P20GM103446)
- NIH Shared Instrumentation (NIH S10OD028725)
- Delaware Biotechnology Institute
- State of Delaware
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- protein language models, fine-tuning, viral proteins, protein embeddings, parameter-efficient learning, protein sequence modeling, emerging infectious diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review