CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingHealth, psychology, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The affective profiles, psychological well-being, and harmony: environmental mastery and self-acceptance predict the sense of a harmonious life

Open access
Garcia, Danilo, Al Nima, Ali, Kjell, Oscar N.E.·2014·PeerJ
DOI 10.7717/peerj.259PMC PMC3933359
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background. An important outcome from the debate on whether wellness equals happiness, is the need of research focusing on how psychological well-being might influence humans' ability to adapt to the changing environment and live in harmony. To get a detailed picture of the influence of positive and negative affect, the current study employed the affective profiles model in which individuals are categorised into groups based on either high positive and low negative affect (self-fulfilling); high positive and high negative affect (high affective); low positive and low negative affect (low affective); and high negative and low positive affect (self-destructive). The aims were to (1) investigate differences between affective profiles in psychological well-being and harmony and (2) how psychological well-being and its dimensions relate to harmony within the four affective profiles. Method. 500 participants (mean age = 34.14 years, SD. = ±12.75 years; 187 males and 313 females) were recruited online and required to answer three self-report measures: The Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; The Scales of Psychological Well-Being (short version) and The Harmony in Life Scale. We conducted a Multivariate Analysis of Variance where the affective profiles and gender were the independent factors and psychological well-being composite score, its six dimensions as well as the harmony in life score were the dependent factors. In addition, we conducted four multi-group (i.e., the four affective profiles) moderation analyses with the psychological well-being dimensions as predictors and harmony in life as the dependent variables. Results. Individuals categorised as self-fulfilling, as compared to the other profiles, tended to score higher on the psychological well-being dimensions: positive relations, environmental mastery, self-acceptance, autonomy, personal growth, and purpose in life. In addition, 47% to 66% of the variance of the harmony in life was explained by the dimensions of psychological well-being within the four affective profiles. Specifically, harmony in life was significantly predicted by environmental mastery and self-acceptance across all affective profiles. However, for the low affective group high purpose in life predicted low levels of harmony in life. Conclusions. The results demonstrated that affective profiles systematically relate to psychological well-being and harmony in life. Notably, individuals categorised as self-fulfilling tended to report higher levels of both psychological well-being and harmony in life when compared with the other profiles. Meanwhile individuals in the self-destructive group reported the lowest levels of psychological well-being and harmony when compared with the three other profiles. It is proposed that self-acceptance and environmental acceptance might enable individuals to go from self-destructive to a self-fulfilling state that also involves harmony in life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj.259

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Structural equation model of the six dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life via the self-destructive group. All correlations (between different psychological well-being dimensions) and all paths (from the six dimensions of psychological well-being to harmony in life) and their standardized parameter estimates. Chi-square = .00; DF = 00; comparative fit index = 1.00; incremental fit index = 1.00 and normed fit index = 1.00. e = error. Red standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p <.001 level (n = 137).
Figure 1 Structural equation model of the six dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life via the self-destructive group. All correlations (between different psychological well-being dimensions) and all paths (from the six dimensions of psychological well-being to harmony in life) and their standardized parameter estimates. Chi-square = .00; DF = 00; comparative fit index = 1.00; incremental fit index = 1.00 and normed fit index = 1.00. e = error. Red standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p <.001 level (n = 137).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Structural equation model of the six dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life via low affective group. All correlations (between different psychological well-being dimensions) and all paths (from the six dimensions of psychological well-being to harmony in life) and their standardized parameter estimates. Chi-square = .00; DF = 00; comparative fit index = 1.00; incremental fit index = 1.00 and normed fit index = 1.00. e = error. Red standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p < .001 level (n = 66).
Figure 2 Structural equation model of the six dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life via low affective group. All correlations (between different psychological well-being dimensions) and all paths (from the six dimensions of psychological well-being to harmony in life) and their standardized parameter estimates. Chi-square = .00; DF = 00; comparative fit index = 1.00; incremental fit index = 1.00 and normed fit index = 1.00. e = error. Red standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p < .001 level (n = 66).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Structural equation model of the six dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life via high affective group. All correlations (between different psychological well-being dimensions) and all paths (from the six dimensions of psychological well-being to harmony in life) and their standardized parameter estimates. Chi-square = .00; DF = 00; comparative fit index = 1.00; incremental fit index = 1.00 and normed fit index = 1.00. e = error. Red standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p < .001 level and blue standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p < .05 level (n = 137).
Figure 3 Structural equation model of the six dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life via high affective group. All correlations (between different psychological well-being dimensions) and all paths (from the six dimensions of psychological well-being to harmony in life) and their standardized parameter estimates. Chi-square = .00; DF = 00; comparative fit index = 1.00; incremental fit index = 1.00 and normed fit index = 1.00. e = error. Red standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p < .001 level and blue standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p < .05 level (n = 137).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Structural equation model of the six dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life via self-fulfilling group. All correlations (between different psychological well-being dimensions) and all paths (from the six dimensions of psychological well-being to harmony in life) and their standardized parameter estimates. Chi-square = .00; DF = 00; comparative fit index = 1.00; incremental fit index = 1.00 and normed fit index = 1.00. e = error. Red standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p < .001 level (n = 160).
Figure 4 Structural equation model of the six dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life via self-fulfilling group. All correlations (between different psychological well-being dimensions) and all paths (from the six dimensions of psychological well-being to harmony in life) and their standardized parameter estimates. Chi-square = .00; DF = 00; comparative fit index = 1.00; incremental fit index = 1.00 and normed fit index = 1.00. e = error. Red standardized parameter estimates of regression weights are significant at the p < .001 level (n = 160).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Summary of the results showing the differences between affective profiles in the 6 dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life.
Figure 5 Summary of the results showing the differences between affective profiles in the 6 dimensions of psychological well-being and harmony in life.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Adrianson, 2013, Cultural influences upon health, affect, self-esteem and impulsiveness: An Indonesian-Swedish comparison, International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 10.5861/ijrsp.2013.228 · DOI
  2. Archer, 2008, Affective personality as cognitive-emotional presymptom profiles regulatory for self-reported health predispositions, Neurotoxicity Research, 14, 21, 10.1007/BF03033573 · DOI
  3. Archer, 2007, Influence of affective personality on cog- nitive-mediated emotional processing: Need for empowerment, European Journal of Psychiatry, 21, 21, 10.4321/S0213-61632007000400002 · DOI
  4. Archer, 2013, The inductive agency of stress: From perinatal to adolescent induction, 10.1007/978-1-4614-5605-6_1 · DOI
  5. Archer, 2013, Epigenetic modulation of mood disorders, Journal of Genetic Syndromes & Gene Therapy, 4, 120, 10.4172/2157-7412.1000120 · DOI
  6. Bergman, 2003, Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach, 10.4324/9781410606822 · DOI
  7. Biswas-Diener, 2009, Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness, Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 208, 10.1080/17439760902844400 · DOI
  8. Bood, 2004, Affective personality in relation to general personality, self-reported stress, coping and optimism, Individual Differences Research, 2, 26
  9. Buhrmester, 2011, Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3, 10.1177/1745691610393980 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Clarke, 2001, Measuring psychological well-being in the Canadian study of health and aging, International Psychogeriatrics, 13, 79, 10.1017/S1041610202008013 · DOI
  11. Cloninger, 2004, Feeling good: the science of well-being, 10.1093/oso/9780195051377.001.0001 · DOI
  12. Cloninger, 2006, Fostering spirituality and well-being in clinical practice, Psychiatric Annals, 36, 1, 10.3928/00485713-20060301-07 · DOI
  13. Cloninger, 2013, What makes people healthy, happy, and fulfilled in the face of current world challenges?, Mens Sana Monographs, 1, 16, 10.4103/0973-1229.109288 · DOI
  14. Cloninger, 2011, Personality and the perception of health and happiness, Journal of Affective Disorders, 128, 24, 10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.012 · DOI
  15. Christopher, 1999, Situating psychological well-being: Exploring the cultural roots of its theory and research, Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 141, 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02434.x · DOI
  16. Delle Fave, 2009, The contribution of diversity to happiness research, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 205, 10.1080/17439760902844319 · DOI
  17. Diener, 1984, Subjective well-being, Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542, 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Diener, 1985, The satisfaction with life scale, Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71, 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901˙13 · DOI
  19. Adolescents’ happiness: The role of the affective temperament model on memory and apprehension of events, subjective well-being, and psychological well-being. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
  20. Garcia, 2012, The affective temperaments: differences between adolescents in the big five model and Cloninger’s psychobiological model of personality, Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 999, 10.1007/s10902-011-9303-5 · DOI
  21. Garcia, 2013, La vie en Rose: high levels of well-being and events inside and outside autobiographical memory, Journal of Happiness Studies, 10.1007/s10902-013-9443-x · DOI
  22. Garcia, 2013, Self-directedness and cooperativeness, psychosocial dysfunction and suffering in ESSENCE, The Scientific World Journal, 10.1155/2013/416981 · DOI
  23. Garcia, 2012, Adolescent life satisfaction and well-being, Journal of Alternative Medicine Research, 4, 271
  24. Garcia, 2013, The happy personality: a tale of two philosophies, 41
  25. Garcia, 2012, Temperament, character, and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: focusing on affect, Depression Research and Treatment, 10.1155/2012/925372 · DOI
  26. Garcia, 2013, International note: temperament and character’s relationship to subjective well-being in salvadorian adolescents and young adults, Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1115, 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.018 · DOI
  27. Garcia, 2013, Temperament and character in the child and adolescent twin study in sweden (CATSS): Comparison to the general population, and genetic structure analysis, PLoS ONE, 8, e70475, 10.1371/journal.pone.0070475 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Garcia, 2013, The affective temperaments and well-being: Swedish and Iranian adolescents’ life satisfaction and psychological well-being, Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 689, 10.1007/s10902-012-9349-z · DOI
  29. Garcia, 2009a, Adolescents’ affective temperaments: life satisfaction, interpretation and memory of events, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 155, 10.1080/17439760802399349 · DOI
  30. Garcia, 2009b, Adolescents’ psychological well-being and memory for life events: influences on life satisfaction with respect to temperamental dispositions, Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 387, 10.1007/s10902-008-9096-3 · DOI
  31. Garcia, 2013, Quantifying the semantic representations in adolescents’ memories of positive and negative life events, Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1309
  32. Garcia, 2010, On lions and adolescents: affective temperaments and the influence of negative stimuli on memory, Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 477, 10.1007/s10902-009-9153-6 · DOI
  33. Horton, 2011, The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market, Experimental Economics, 14, 399, 10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9 · DOI
  34. Jimmefors, Locomotion (empowering) and assessment (disempowering) self-reglatory dimensions as a function of affective profiles in high school students, International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology
  35. Johansson, 2013, Personality change after interner-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for depression, PeerJ, 1, e39, 10.7717/peerj.39 · DOI
  36. Kjell, 2011, Sustainable well-being: a potential synergy between sustainability and well-being research, Review of General Psychology, 15, 255, 10.1037/a0024603 · DOI
  37. Kjell, 2013, Iranian and swedish adolescents: differences in personality traits and well-being, PeerJ, 1, e197, 10.7717/peerj.197 · DOI
  38. Kjell, The harmony in life scale complements the satisfaction with life scale: expanding the conceptualization and measurement of the cognitive component of subjective well-being, Journal of Happiness Studies
  39. Karlsson, 2007, Relationship between personality characteristics and affect: gender and affective personality, Individual Differences Research, 5, 44
  40. Kunst, 2011, Affective personality type, post-traumatic stress disorder symptom severity and post-traumatic growth in victims of violence, Stress and Health, 27, 42, 10.1002/smi.1318 · DOI
  41. Lavrakas, 2008, Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, 10.4135/9781412963947 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Lindahl, 2013, Depressive expression and anti-depressive protection in adolescence: stress, positive affect, motivation and self-efficacy, Psychology, 4, 495, 10.4236/psych.2013.46070 · DOI
  43. MacDonald, 2013, The affective personality, sleep, and autobiographical memories, The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, 8, 305, 10.1080/17439760.2013.800904 · DOI
  44. Nima, 2012, Adolescents’ happiness-increasing strategies, temperament, and character: mediation models on subjective well-being, Health, 4, 802, 10.4236/health.2012.410124 · DOI
  45. Nima, 2013, The happiness-increasing strategies scales in a sample of Swedish adolescents, International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1, 196, 10.1504/IJHD.2013.055647 · DOI
  46. Nima, 2013, Anxiety, affect, self-esteem, and stress: mediation and moderation effects on depression, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0073265 · DOI
  47. Norlander, 2002, Performance during stress: affective personality age, and regularity of physical exercise, Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 495, 10.2224/sbp.2002.30.5.495 · DOI
  48. Norlander, 2005, The affective personality: its relation to quality of sleep, well-being and stress, Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 709, 10.2224/sbp.2005.33.7.709 · DOI
  49. Palomo, 2008, Focusing on symtoms rather than diagnoses in brain dysfunction: Conscious and nonconscious expression in impulsiveness and decision making, Neurotoxicity Research, 14, 1, 10.1007/BF03033572 · DOI
  50. Palomo, 2007, Treatment consideration and manifest complexity in comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders, Neurotoxicity Research, 12, 43, 10.1007/BF03033900 · DOI
  51. Paolacci, 2010, Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk, Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411, 10.1017/S1930297500002205 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Russell, 1999, Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805, 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805 · DOI
  53. Ryan, 2009, Wellness as healthy functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking, The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to Furthering Research and Promoting Good Practice, 4, 202, 10.1080/17439760902844285 · DOI
  54. Ryff, 1995, Psychological well-being in adult life, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99, 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395 · DOI
  55. Schütz, 2013, Character profiles and adolescents’ self-reported affect, Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 841, 10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.020 · DOI
  56. Schütz, 2014, Affective state, stress, and type a-personality as a function of gender and affective profiles, International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 3, 51, 10.5861/ijrsp.2013.450 · DOI
  57. Schütz, 2013, The affective profiles in the USA: happiness, depression, life satisfaction, and happiness- increasing strategies, PeerJ, 1, e156, 10.7717/peerj.156 · DOI
  58. Shapiro, 2013, Using mechanical turk to study clinical populations, Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 213, 10.1177/2167702612469015 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Straume, 2012, Happiness, inspiration and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the workplace, The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to Furthering Research and Promoting Good Practice, 7, 387, 10.1080/17439760.2012.711348 · DOI
  60. Waterman, 2008, Reconsidering happiness: a eudaimonist’s perspective, The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to Furthering Research and Promoting Good Practice, 3, 234, 10.1080/17439760802303002 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Watson, 1988, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Yik, 1999, Structure of self reported current affect: integration and beyond, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 600, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.600 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 130

Metadata

Authors
Garcia, D., Al Nima, A., & Kjell, O. N. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Network for Empowerment and Well-Being, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Garcia, Danilo
ORCID
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2014-02-13
Volume
2
Pages
e259
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.7717/peerj.259
PMC
PMC3933359
OpenAlex
W2023985296
Cited by
130
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
FWCI
18.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
affective profiles, psychological well-being, harmony in life, environmental mastery, self-acceptance, positive affect, negative affect, meaning of life, PANAS, gender differences, life satisfaction, autonomy, personal growth, positive relationships, moderation analysis, meaning in life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review