Cited by 115Immunotherapy and Immune Responsesvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmune responses and vaccinations

Application of built-in adjuvants for epitope-based vaccines

Open access
Lei, Yao, Zhao, Furong, Shao, Junjun, Li, Yangfan, Li, Shifang, Chang, Huiyun, Zhang, Yongguang·2019·PeerJ

Abstract

Several studies have shown that epitope vaccines exhibit substantial advantages over conventional vaccines. However, epitope vaccines are associated with limited immunity, which can be overcome by conjugating antigenic epitopes with built-in adjuvants (e.g., some carrier proteins or new biomaterials) with special properties, including immunologic specificity, good biosecurity and biocompatibility, and the ability to vastly improve the immune response of epitope vaccines. When designing epitope vaccines, the following types of built-in adjuvants are typically considered: (1) pattern recognition receptor ligands (i.e., toll-like receptors); (2) virus-like particle carrier platforms; (3) bacterial toxin proteins; and (4) novel potential delivery systems (e.g., self-assembled peptide nanoparticles, lipid core peptides, and polymeric or inorganic nanoparticles). This review primarily discusses the current and prospective applications of these built-in adjuvants (i.e., biological carriers) to provide some references for the future design of epitope-based vaccines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj.6185

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lei, Y., Zhao, F., Shao, J., Li, Y., Li, S., Chang, H., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chang, Huiyun
  • Zhang, Yongguang
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2019-01-14
Volume
6
Pages
e6185
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909118094
Cited by
115
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFD0500902)
  • Key R&D Program of Gansu Province of China (17YF1NA070)
  • National Pig Industrial System of China (CARS-36-06B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
epitope-based vaccine, carrier proteins, biomaterials, Toll-like receptors, peptide nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, inorganic nanoparticles, vaccine delivery systems, immune enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review