Application of built-in adjuvants for epitope-based vaccines
Open accessAbstract
Several studies have shown that epitope vaccines exhibit substantial advantages over conventional vaccines. However, epitope vaccines are associated with limited immunity, which can be overcome by conjugating antigenic epitopes with built-in adjuvants (e.g., some carrier proteins or new biomaterials) with special properties, including immunologic specificity, good biosecurity and biocompatibility, and the ability to vastly improve the immune response of epitope vaccines. When designing epitope vaccines, the following types of built-in adjuvants are typically considered: (1) pattern recognition receptor ligands (i.e., toll-like receptors); (2) virus-like particle carrier platforms; (3) bacterial toxin proteins; and (4) novel potential delivery systems (e.g., self-assembled peptide nanoparticles, lipid core peptides, and polymeric or inorganic nanoparticles). This review primarily discusses the current and prospective applications of these built-in adjuvants (i.e., biological carriers) to provide some references for the future design of epitope-based vaccines.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Tam, J. P. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.15.5409 · Cited by 1,251 · see citing works
A vaccine against nicotine for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial
Cornuz, J., Zwahlen, S., Jungi, W. F., Osterwalder, J., Klingler, K., van Melle, G., Bangala, Y., Guessous, I., Müller, P., Willers, J., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002547 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Lei, Y., Zhao, F., Shao, J., Li, Y., Li, S., Chang, H., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Huiyun
- Zhang, Yongguang
- Venue
- PeerJ
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2019-01-14
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- e6185
- ISSN
- 2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6336016
- OpenAlex
- W2909118094
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFD0500902)
- Key R&D Program of Gansu Province of China (17YF1NA070)
- National Pig Industrial System of China (CARS-36-06B)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
- Keywords
- epitope-based vaccine, carrier proteins, biomaterials, Toll-like receptors, peptide nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, inorganic nanoparticles, vaccine delivery systems, immune enhancement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review