Brain structural and functional changes in patients with major depressive disorder: a literature review
Open accessAbstract
Depression is a mental disorder characterized by low mood and anhedonia that involves abnormalities in multiple brain regions and networks. Epidemiological studies demonstrated that depression has become one of the most important diseases affecting human health and longevity. The pathogenesis of the disease has not been fully elucidated. The clinical effect of treatment is not satisfactory in many cases. Neuroimaging studies have provided rich and valuable evidence that psychological symptoms and behavioral deficits in patients with depression are closely related to structural and functional abnormalities in specific areas of the brain. There were morphological differences in several brain regions, including the frontal lobe, temporal lobe, and limbic system, in people with depression compared to healthy people. In addition, people with depression also had abnormal functional connectivity to the default mode network, the central executive network, and the salience network. These findings provide an opportunity to re-understand the biological mechanisms of depression. In the future, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may serve as an important auxiliary tool for psychiatrists in the process of early and accurate diagnosis of depression and finding the appropriate treatment target for each patient to optimize clinical response.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The central executive network is anchored in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortices and is associated with executive functioning.
“The CEN, anchored in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and posterior parietal cortices (PPC), is associated with executive functioning [36–42].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Dai, L., Zhou, H., Xu, X., & Zuo, Z.
- Affiliations
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Xiangyang
- Venue
- PeerJ
- Publisher
- PeerJ
- Published
- 2019-11-29
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- e8170
- ISSN
- 2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6886485
- OpenAlex
- W2989963038
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, structural brain abnormalities, functional brain abnormalities, neuroimaging, default mode network, frontoparietal network, salience network, limbic system, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, depression pathogenesis, depression diagnosis, treatment goals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review