Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 67Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Choosing between Glaser and Strauss: an example: Adeline Cooney looks at the reasons for choosing either Glaserian or Straussian grounded theory when conducting research and why she made her choice in a recent study

Cooney, Adeline·2010·Nurse Researcher
DOI 10.7748/nr2010.07.17.4.18.c7921
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Choosing between Glaserian and Straussian grounded theory when selecting a methodological approach can be challenging, but few papers consider this decision-making process. This paper explores the Glaser-Strauss debate using an example of a study which explored whether older people experience a sense of home in residential settings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7748/nr2010.07.17.4.18.c7921

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cooney, A.
Affiliations
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Cooney, Adeline
ORCID
Cooney, Adeline
Venue
Nurse Researcher
Publisher
RCN Publishing Ltd.
Published
2010-07
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
18-28
ISSN
  • 1351-5578 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-8992
DOI
10.7748/nr2010.07.17.4.18.c7921
OpenAlex
W2413992668
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
33.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Researcher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
grounded theory, methodological choices, sense of home, older adults, residential care, qualitative research methodology
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Inpatients, Nursing Theory, Residential Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.