Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Teledermatology Consultations at a Local Veterans Affairs Dermatology Clinic
Open accessAbstract
With the advances in health information technology and the need for increased access to specialized health care, the advent of telemedicine was designed to bring care to individuals at a distance. Telemedicine decreases barriers to health care and brings medical specialists to underserved areas and populations. We have seen a tremendous increase in the need and utilization of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the lockdowns and social distancing efforts. Virtual care continues to be extended to patients to maintain their health care needs when in-person clinic appointments are not feasible or ideal such as seen during a pandemic. Telemedicine is an additional tool that has proven vital to our healthcare system. To provide optimal care, a strong technological infrastructure must be in place. Once in practice, positive outcomes have been noted for patients and healthcare providers as diagnosis, treatment, and appropriate triage can be made virtually and at the patients' convenience. To ensure high-quality care is provided through the Veterans Affairs teledermatology consultation service, we investigated the concordance of teledermatology diagnoses with clinical examination findings through a retrospective chart review covering a one-year time period. Our study found a concordance of 75.3% between the teledermatology diagnoses and the in-person clinical diagnoses. The main limitation we found to virtual examination is the inability to perform total body skin examinations. We found that 60.2% of patients had additional diagnoses when examined in person, with 8.4% of patients having an additional malignant diagnosis. These findings highlight the need for in-person examinations when feasible to ensure that no other diagnoses go undiscovered if not captured on the submitted images for teledermatology consultation. Despite the limitations posed by photographic examination, teledermatology can be used as a reliable method for diagnosis when a conventional in-person examination is not readily available or ideal, such as during a pandemic, and can serve as a powerful triaging tool.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The inability to palpate or acquire certain physical signs without advanced equipment can impede diagnostic judgment due to missed details.
“The inability to palpate or acquire certain physical signs without advanced equipment can impede diagnostic judgment due to missed details [238,239].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [239]
The Conclusions identify the lack of tactile examination and image limitations as constraints on virtual assessment, and the Discussion reports additional diagnoses found during in-person examinations. These passages support the concern about missed details, but the paper does not discuss needing advanced equipment to acquire physical signs. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: A systematic review
Warshaw, E. M., Hillman, Y. J., Greer, N. L., Hagel, E. M., MacDonald, R., Rutks, I. R., & Wilt, T. J. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.026 · Cited by 310 · cited 1× · see citing works
“calculated a mean weighted diagnostic concordance for 10 studies that assessed the SAF technique [14].”
MethodO’Connor, D. M., Jew, O. S., Perman, M. J., Castelo-Soccio, L. A., Winston, F. K., & McMahon, P. J. (2017) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.4280 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Edison, K. E., Ward, D. S., Dyer, J. A., Lane, W., Chance, L., & Hicks, L. L. (2008) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2008.0001 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Nami, N., Massone, C., Rubegni, P., Cevenini, G., Fimiani, M., & Hofmann-Wellenhof, R. (2015) · Acta Dermato-Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-1876 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
The reliability of diagnosis using store-and-forward teledermatology
Du Moulin, M. F. M. T., Bullens-Goessens, Y. I. J. M., Henquet, C. J. M., Brunenberg, D. E. M., de Bruyn-Geraerds, D. P., Winkens, R. A. G., Dirksen, C. D., Vierhout, W. P. M., & Neumann, H. A. M. (2003) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/135763303769211247 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is relatively consistent with previously reported concordance values that compare SAF diagnoses with followup IP diagnoses [4-10].”
Result
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [1]Teledermatology during COVID-19: an updated review [PREPRINT] Am J Clin Dermatol Farr MA Duvic M Joshi TP 1 9 2021 33835345 PMC8032846
- [2]Rapid Increase in telemental health within the Department of Veterans Affairs during the COVID-19 pandemic Telemed J E Health Connolly SL Stolzmann KL Heyworth L Weaver KR Bauer MS Miller CJ 454 458 27 2021 32926664
- [4]Store-and-forward teledermatology impact on diagnosis, treatment and dermatology referrals: comparison between practice settings [PREPRINT] J Telemed Telecare Pasadyn SR McAfee JL Vij A Warren CB 1357633 2020 32448029
- [5]The utility of teledermatology in the evaluation of skin lesions [PREPRINT] J Telemed Telecare Clarke EL Reichenberg JS Ahmed AM Keeling B Custer J Rathouz PJ Jambusaria-Pahlajani A 1357633 2021 33461401
- [8]Lessons learned after a three-year store and forward teledermatology experience using internet: strengths and limitations Int J Med Inform Lasierra N Alesanco A Gilaberte Y Magallón R García J 332 343 81 2012 22425394
- [9]Preliminary results of DERMATEL: prospective randomized study comparing synchronous and asynchronous modalities of teledermatology. (Article in Spanish) Actas Dermosifiliogr Romero G García M Vera E Martínez C Cortina P Sánchez P Guerra A 630 636 97 2006 17173824
- [11]Comparison of teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study Br J Dermatol Gilmour E Campbell SM Loane MA 81 87 139 1998 9764153
- [12]Patient perceptions and satisfaction with teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey-based study J Drugs Dermatol Yeroushalmi S Millan SH Nelson K Sparks A Friedman AJ 178 183 20 2021 33538563
- [13]Definitions, survey methods, and findings of patient satisfaction studies in teledermatology: a systematic review Arch Dermatol Res Hadeler E Gitlow H Nouri K 205 201 313 2021 32725501 PMC7385477
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnostic reliability in teledermatology: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
Bourkas, A. N., Barone, N., Bourkas, M. E. C., Mannarino, M., Fraser, R. D. J., Lorincz, A., Wang, S. C., & Ramirez-GarciaLuna, J. L. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068207 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors
Yen, C., Epling, J. W., Rockwell, M., & Vaughn-Cooke, M. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16020347 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for skin diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Martyin, K., Meznerics, F. A., Bokor, L. A., Szabó, B., Hegyi, P., Kiss, N., & Bánvölgyi, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1739592 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gerhardt, C. A., Foels, R., Grewe, S., & Baldwin, B. T.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Lehigh Valley Health Network (US)
- James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gerhardt, Caroline A
- Venue
- Cureus
- Published
- 2021-06-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e15406-e15406
- ISSN
- 2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8253700
- OpenAlex
- W3169669567
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
- Keywords
- teledermatology, telemedicine, diagnostic accuracy, total body skin examination, skin cancer detection, COVID-19 pandemic, veterans, triage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review