The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three Effective, Efficient, and Easily Implementable Ways to Integrate A.I. Into Medical Education
Open accessAbstract
As a medical school CEO who is following the development of A.I. very closely, I believe that med students are eager to adopt the possibilities that A.I. tools can deliver in their training. Not only do these students already use variations of A.I. in other areas of their lives, but they also embrace advanced technology and understand how to use it. With the tech readiness of today's students in mind, I have devised three recommendations for how to best infuse A.I. into medical education. This strategic guidance can deliver significant benefits to today's tech-fluent medical school students and enhance their training in their journeys to become doctors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Numerous articles (5%) provide guidelines and “tips” on AI in medical education [57, 83, 94, 135, 136, 162, 179, 186, 195, 196, 202, 205–210].”
From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [162]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Gen Z graduates are fluent in AI and ready to join the workforce. (2023). Accessed. June 28, 2023: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/28/ai-gen-z-work/.
(n.d.)
UnresolvedHow medical schools are missing the mark on artificial intelligence. (2023). Accessed. January 12, 2023: https://www.statnews.com/2023/01/12/medical-school-artificial-intelligence-health-curriculum/.
(n.d.)
UnresolvedGarbage in, garbage out (GIGO). (2023). Accessed. June 1, 2023: https://www.techtarget.com/searchsoftwarequality/definition/garbage-in-garbage-out#:~:text=The%20first%20recorded%20u....
(n.d.)
Unresolved
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xu, X., Chen, Y., & Miao, J. (2024) · Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions · doi:10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.6 · Cited by 169
“…emphasized that teachers should instruct students on how to use ChatGPT, including informing them of the limitations and advantages of AI, guiding them on how to discern the feasibility, authenticity, and accuracy of information provided by AI, and adhering to ethical and moral standards [47,48].”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review
Simoni, J., Urtubia-Fernandez, J., Mengual, E., Simoni, D. A., Royo, M., Egaña-Yin, D., Hertog, O. L. A., López-Ortiz, L., Muñoz-Tomás, A., Santiago-Martínez, P., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08188-2 · Cited by 62
“%) provide guidelines and “tips” on AI in medical education [57, 83, 94, 135, 136, 162, 179, 186, 195, 196, 202, 205–210].”
Artificial intelligence in medical problem-based learning: opportunities and challenges
Chen, Y., Qi, H. Y., Qiu, Y. L., Li, J., Zhu, L. W., Gao, X., Wang, H., & Jiang, G. (2024) · Global Medical Education · doi:10.1515/gme-2024-0015 · Cited by 4
He, Y., Chen, C., Yin, R., Zhang, W., Chang, H., Yang, W., Li, F., Li, X., Xia, Z., Xie, X., et al. (2026) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/92486
“In contrast, students with higher baseline proficiency have already mastered the theoretical principles of history-taking and possess the cognitive capacity to thoroughly interpret AI-generated feedback [44,45].”
Simoni, J., Pereira, J. L., Sánchez, S. C., Egaña-Yin, D., García-Gargallo, C., Hertog, O. L. A., Idoate, A., López-Ortiz, L., Morales-Gutiérrez, I., Romero, A., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1918847
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenihan, D.
- Affiliations
- Ponce Health Sciences University (PR)
- Corresponding author
- Lenihan, David
- Venue
- Cureus
- Published
- 2023-10-17
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e47204-e47204
- ISSN
- 2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10581027
- OpenAlex
- W4387706149
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, medical education, AI integration strategies, medical students, technology readiness, medical school leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three Effective, Efficient, and Easily Implementable Ways to Integrate A.I. Into Medical Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7759/cureus.47204
- The paper
- Lenihan, D. (2023). Three Effective, Efficient, and Easily Implementable Ways to Integrate A.I. Into Medical Education. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47204
