Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of Biological Versus Synthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Long‐Term Outcomes and Recurrence Rates

Khan, Arif, Elmadbouh, Sarah, Khalid, Sibthein A, Ayub, Mohid, Mahmood, Sufyan, Ravendran, Kapilraj·2025·Cureus
DOI 10.7759/cureus.92557
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.92557

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, et al.. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015, 19:1-24. 10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Parker SG, Mallett S, Quinn L, et al.. Identifying predictors of ventral hernia recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2021, 5:10.1093/bjsopen/zraa071 · DOI
  3. Bhardwaj P, Huayllani MT, Olson MA, Janis JE. Year-over-year ventral hernia recurrence rates and risk factors. JAMA Surg. 2024, 159:651-8. 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0233 · DOI
  4. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al.. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000, 343:392-8. 10.1056/NEJM200008103430603 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK. Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2016, 40:89-99. 10.1007/s00268-015-3252-9 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ferzoco SJ. A systematic review of outcomes following repair of complex ventral incisional hernias with biologic mesh. Int Surg. 2013, 98:399-408. 10.9738/INTSURG-D-12-00002.1 · DOI
  7. Huntington CR, Cox TC, Blair LJ, et al.. Biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: outcomes, recurrence, and charge analysis. Surgery. 2016, 160:1517-27. 10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.008 · DOI
  8. FitzGerald JF, Kumar AS. Biologic versus synthetic mesh reinforcement: what are the pros and cons?. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014, 27:140-8. 10.1055/s-0034-1394155 · DOI
  9. Samson DJ, Gachabayov M, Latifi R. Biologic mesh in surgery: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of selected outcomes in 51 studies and 6079 patients. World J Surg. 2021, 45:3524-40. 10.1007/s00268-020-05887-3 · DOI
  10. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, et al.. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010, 148:544-58. 10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008 · DOI
  11. Baylón K, Rodríguez-Camarillo P, Elías-Zúñiga A, Díaz-Elizondo JA, Gilkerson R, Lozano K. Past, present and future of surgical meshes: a review. Membranes (Basel). 2017, 7:10.3390/membranes7030047 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Özant A, Arslan K. Synthetic meshes in hernia surgery. Cyprus J Med Sci. 2023, 8:1-7. 10.4274/cjms.2022.2021-217 · DOI
  13. Saiding Q, Chen Y, Wang J, Pereira CL, Sarmento B, Cui W, Chen X. Abdominal wall hernia repair: from prosthetic meshes to smart materials. Mater Today Bio. 2023, 21:10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100691 · DOI
  14. Harris HW, Primus F, Young C, et al.. Preventing recurrence in clean and contaminated hernias using biologic versus synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair: the price randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2021, 273:648-55. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004336 · DOI
  15. Miserez M, Lefering R, Famiglietti F, et al.. Synthetic versus biological mesh in laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair (Lapsis): results of a multinational, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial. Ann Surg. 2021, 273:57-65. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004062 · DOI
  16. Olavarria OA, Bernardi K, Dhanani NH, et al.. Synthetic versus biologic mesh for complex open ventral hernia repair: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021, 22:496-503. 10.1089/sur.2020.166 · DOI
  17. Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Petro CC, et al.. Biologic vs synthetic mesh for single-stage repair of contaminated ventral hernias: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2022, 157:293-301. 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6902 · DOI
  18. Siddiqui A, Lyons NB, Anwoju O, et al.. Mesh type with ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Surg Res. 2023, 291:603-10. 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.003 · DOI
  19. Alzahrani A, Alhindi N, Alotaibi S, et al.. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of ventral hernia: biologic versus synthetic mesh. Updates Surg. 2024, 76:2725-31. 10.1007/s13304-024-02001-3 · DOI
  20. Sivaraj D, Fischer KS, Kim TS, et al.. Outcomes of biosynthetic and synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022, 10:10.1097/GOX.0000000000004707 · DOI
  21. Lorenz WR, Holland AM, Kerr SW, et al.. Outcomes of synthetic and biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity-matched analysis in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention class 1 and 2 wounds. Surgery. 2025, 179:10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.055 · DOI
  22. Nissen AT, Henn D, Moshrefi S, Gupta D, Nazerali R, Lee GK. Health-related quality of life after ventral hernia repair with biologic and synthetic mesh. Ann Plast Surg. 2019, 82:332-8. 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001768 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Khan, A., Elmadbouh, S., Khalid, S. A., Ayub, M., Mahmood, S., & Ravendran, K.
Venue
Cureus
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2025-09-17
ISSN
2168-8184
DOI
10.7759/cureus.92557
Cited by
4
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.