Cited by 0Facial Trauma and Fracture ManagementReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesPelvic and Acetabular Injuries

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Efficacy of a Y-modified Transconjunctival Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: Functional Recovery and Cosmetic Outcomes

Open access
Shetty, Sujeeth K, Kasrija, Rishabh·2025·Cureus

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC), a crucial component of the midface, frequently lead to functional impairments, such as diplopia, enophthalmos, and restricted ocular motility. Although surgical intervention is often required, conventional techniques can be limited by suboptimal access and potential aesthetic drawbacks. This study prospectively assessed the efficacy, functional recovery, and cosmetic results of the Y-modified transconjunctival technique for managing ZMC fractures with concomitant orbital floor injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a single oral and maxillofacial surgery department. Fifteen eligible patients (aged 18-65 years) presenting with displaced ZMC fractures and orbital floor defects were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the Y-modified transconjunctival approach. Outcome measures included pain (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score), enophthalmos (Hertel exophthalmometer), scar quality (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0), and paresthesia. Fracture reduction and implant position were verified using high-resolution computed tomography. Patients were systematically evaluated postoperatively on days 1, 10, 28, and 42, and the data were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in pain levels over time, with mean VAS scores declining from 5.82 on postoperative day 1 to 1.00 by day 42 (p < 0.01). Residual enophthalmos was observed in a single case (6.67%). Objective scar evaluation using POSAS 3.0 indicated marked improvements in vascularity, pigmentation, and pliability between the 10- and 28-day assessments (p < 0.01). Furthermore, patient-reported feedback corroborated these findings, indicating a diminished perception of discomfort and a positive view of scar healing. CONCLUSIONS: The Y-modified transconjunctival approach proved to be an effective strategy for ZMC fractures with orbital floor involvement, providing ample surgical exposure for stable fixation while yielding excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes. However, the promising results should be interpreted in the context of the study's limitations, including a modest sample size and single-institution design. Future research involving larger multicenter cohorts with long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm these preliminary findings and establish broader clinical applicability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.96679

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Yamsani B, Gaddipati R, Vura N, Ramisetti S, Yamsani R. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a review of 101 cases. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016, 15:417-24. 10.1007/s12663-015-0851-9 · DOI
  2. Tripathi GM, Sharma D, Gaharwar A, Gupta R, Shukla D, Shukla V. Analysis of prevalence and pattern of zygomatic complex fractures in north-eastern part of Madhya Pradesh, India. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2016, 3:1878-81.
  3. Bradley D, Leung B, Saxena S, Dungarwalla M, Chapireau D, Fan K. Surgical management of zygomatic complex fractures in a major trauma centre. Plast Aesthet Res. 2019, 6:11. 10.20517/2347-9264.2019.06 · DOI
  4. Courtney DJ. Upper buccal sulcus approach to management of fractures of the zygomatic complex: a retrospective study of 50 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999, 37:464-6. 10.1054/bjom.1999.0010 · DOI
  5. Nordgaard JO. Persistent sensory disturbances and diplopia following fractures of the zygoma. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976, 102:80-2. 10.1001/archotol.1976.00780070058004 · DOI
  6. Mishra BP, Harish A, Mathew AM, Pradhan A, Sneha S, Murty V, Makkad RS. Management of zygomatic fractures using different surgical approaches. Bioinformation. 2023, 19:1371-6. 10.6026/973206300191371 · DOI
  7. Farber SJ, Nguyen DC, Skolnick GB, Woo AS, Patel KB. Current management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a multidisciplinary survey and literature review. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9:313-22. 10.1055/s-0036-1592093 · DOI
  8. Kambalimath DH, Kambalimath HV, M.V.V. S, V. A Kumar, T.G. R, Deepak RM. Retrospective analysis of management of zygomatic complex fractures. The Traumaxilla. 2023, 5:20-6. 10.1177/26323273231172739 · DOI
  9. Santosh BS, Giraddi G. Transconjunctival preseptal approach for orbital floor and infraorbital rim fracture. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011, 10:301-5. 10.1007/s12663-011-0246-5 · DOI
  10. Subramanian B, Krishnamurthy S, Suresh Kumar P, Saravanan B, Padhmanabhan M. Comparison of various approaches for exposure of infraorbital rim fractures of zygoma. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009, 8:99-102. 10.1007/s12663-009-0026-7 · DOI
  11. Rajkumar K, Mukhopadhyay P, Sinha R, Bandyopadhyay TK. ‘Y’ modification of the transconjunctival approach for management of zygomatic complex fractures: a prospective analysis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016, 15:45-51. 10.1007/s12663-015-0781-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Melek LN, Noureldin MG. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: finding the least complicated surgical approach (a randomized clinical trial). BMC Oral Health. 2023, 23:539. 10.1186/s12903-023-03249-8 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Martinez AY, Bradrick JP. Y modification of the transconjunctival approach for management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a technical note. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012, 70:97-101. 10.1016/j.joms.2011.05.009 · DOI
  14. Tahernia A, Erdmann D, Follmar K, Mukundan S, Grimes J, Marcus JR. Clinical implications of orbital volume change in the management of isolated and zygomaticomaxillary complex-associated orbital floor injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009, 123:968-75. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f486 · DOI
  15. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978, 37:378-81. 10.1136/ard.37.4.378 · DOI
  16. Carrière ME, Mokkink LB, Tyack Z, et al.. Development of the patient scale of the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) 3.0: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res. 2023, 32:583-92. 10.1007/s11136-022-03244-6 · DOI
  17. Oztel M, Goh R, Hsu E. Subtarsal versus transconjunctival approach: a long-term follow-up of esthetic outcomes and complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021, 79:1327.e1-6. 10.1016/j.joms.2021.02.004 · DOI
  18. Ridgway EB, Chen C, Lee BT. Acquired entropion associated with the transconjunctival incision for facial fracture management. J Craniofac Surg. 2009, 20:1412-5. 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181aee3ee · DOI
  19. Wang HD, Dillon J. Contemporary management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Semin Plast Surg. 2021, 35:256-62. 10.1055/s-0041-1735812 · DOI
  20. Shoukath S, Taylor GI, Mendelson BC, Corlett RJ, Shayan R, Tourani SS, Ashton MW. The lymphatic anatomy of the lower eyelid and conjunctiva and correlation with postoperative chemosis and edema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017, 139:628-37. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003094 · DOI
  21. El-Anwar MW, Elsheikh E, Hussein AM, Tantawy AA, Abdelbaki YM. Transconjunctival versus subciliary approach to the infraorbital margin for open reduction of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a randomized feasibility study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017, 21:187-92. 10.1007/s10006-017-0617-2 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Shetty, S. K., & Kasrija, R.
Affiliations
JSS Dental College and Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
Kasrija, Rishabh
Venue
Cureus
Published
2025-11-12
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
e96679-e96679
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416203802
Cited by
0
References
20
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Keywords
zygomatic fractures, orbital floor fracture, open reduction and internal fixation, enophthalmos, scar quality, functional recovery, midface fractures, postoperative pain, paresthesia, cosmetic outcome, diplopia, ocular motility restriction, surgical exposure, fracture reduction quality, patient-reported outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of a Y-modified Transconjunctival Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: Functional Recovery and Cosmetic Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7759/cureus.96679
The paper
Shetty, S. K., & Kasrija, R. (2025). Efficacy of a Y-modified Transconjunctival Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: Functional Recovery and Cosmetic Outcomes. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96679