Cited by 124Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentPlant and soil sciencesRural Development and Agriculture

Agroecology: challenges and opportunities for farming in the Anthropocene

Open access
Altieri, Miguel A., Nicholls, Clara·2020·International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources

Abstract

The multiple crises facing humanity at the onset of the Anthropocene are creating a moment in which agroecology acquires greater relevance as an alternative approach for meeting sustainable development goals and providing guidelines for the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agricultural system that is capable of minimizing future widespread disruptions of food supplies by pandemics and climate change by enhancing linkages between small-scale food production and local consumption. There are three main areas in which agroecology can be used in the development of a new post-COVID-19 agricultural system: revitalizing small farms, creating alternative animal production systems and enhancing urban agriculture. Focusing food and agricultural policies on agroecology as a main strategy for achieving autonomy and resilience can rapidly transform the ways in which we produce and consume food while addressing global challenges, including climate change, biodiversity loss, food insecurity, poverty, and deteriorating health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7764/ijanr.v47i3.2281

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The benefits of agroecology often emerge through the interaction of practices rather than their singular application, with recycling and diversification contributing to resource-use efficiency, resilience, and ecosystem services.

    “Previous studies have highlighted that the benefits of agroecology often emerge through the interaction of practices rather than their singular application, with recycling and diversification contributing to resource-use efficiency, resilience, and ecosystem services (Altieri and Nicholls, 2020;Tittonell and Giller, 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Altieri, M.A. (2002). Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93:1-24 doi: 10.1016/S0167- 8809(02)00085-3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Altieri, M.A. & Nicholls, C.I. (2020). Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agri- culture, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47:881- 898. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2020.1782891 · DOI
  3. Aman F., & Masood S. (2020). How Nutrition can help to fight against COVID-19 Pandemic. Paki- stan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19- S4): COVID19-S121-S123. doi: 10.12669/ pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2776 · DOI
  4. Campbell, B.M., Beare, D.J., Bennett, E.M., Hall- Spencer, J.M, Ingram, J.S.I., Jaramillo, F., Ortiz, R., Ramankutty, N., Sayer, J.A., & Shindell, D. (2017). Agriculture Production as a Major Driver of the Earth System Exceeding Planetary Bound- aries. Ecology and Society, 22(4):8. doi: 10.5751/ ES-09595-220408 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Capra, F., & Luisi, P.L. (2014). The systems view of life: a unifying vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  6. Giraldo, O.F., & Rosset, P. (2018). Agroecology and a territory in dispute: between institutionality and social movements. Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(3):545-564.
  7. Gliessman, S.R. (2010). Agroecology: The Ecol- ogy of Sustainable Food Systems, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  8. Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Had- dad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., Pretty, J., Rob- inson, S., Thomas, S.M., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327:812-818. doi: 10.1126/sci- ence.1185383 · DOI
  9. Green, R.E., Cornell, S.J., Scharlemann, J.P.W, & Balmford, A. (2005). Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science, 307:550-555. doi: 10.1126/ science.1106049 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Holt-Gimenez, E. (2019). How to feed the world without destroying it. Polity, Oxford
  11. Koont, S. (2011). Sustainable urban agriculture in Cuba. Springer, Berlin.
  12. Lappe, F.M., Collins, J., & Rosset, P. (1998). World Hunger: Twelve Myths. 2nd ed. New York: Grove Press.
  13. Masood, A.F, & Aman, S. (2020). How Nutrition can help to fight against COVID-19 Pandemic. Pak J Med Sci, 36(COVID19-S4):COVID19-S121- S123. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2776 · DOI
  14. Murgueitio, E., Calle, Z., Uribea, F., Calle, A., & Solorio, B. (2011). Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. Forest Ecology and Manage- ment, 261:1654-1663. doi 10.1016/j.fore- co.2010.09.027 · DOI
  15. Murgueitio, E., Flores, M., Calle, Z., Chará, J., Bara- hona, R., Molina, C., & Uribe, F. (2015). Produc- tividad en Sistemas Silvopastoriles Intensivos en América Latina. In F. Montagnini, E. Somar- riba, E. Murgueitio, H. Fassola, & B. Eibl (Eds), Sistemas Agroforestales. Funciones Productivas, Socioeconómicas y Ambientales. Serie Técnica Informe Técnico 402 (pp. 59-101), CATIE, Tur- rialba, Costa Rica, Cali: Fundación CIPAV.
  16. Nicholls, C.I., Altieri, M.A., & Vazquez, L. (2016). Principles for the Conversion and Redesign of Farming Systems. Journal of Ecology and Ecog- raphy, S5:10. doi: 10.4127/2157-7265-S5-010. · DOI
  17. Rosset, P.M., Machín-Sosa, B., Roque-Jaime, A.M, & Avila-Lozano, D.R. (2011). The Campesino- to-Campesino agroecology movement of ANAP in Cuba. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1):161- 91. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538584 · DOI
  18. Wallace, R. (2016). Big Farms Make Big Flu: Dis- patches on Infectious Disease, Agribusiness, and the Nature of Science. New York: NYU Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altieri, M. A., & Nicholls, C.
Affiliations
University of California System (US)
Venue
International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Published
2020-12-29
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
204-215
ISSN
  • 0304-5609 (ISSN-L)
  • 2452-5731
OpenAlex
W3115599429
Cited by
124
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scientific Electronic Library Online) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universidad de Chile
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
Keywords
agroecology, Anthropocene, small-scale food production, local food consumption, urban agriculture, food and agricultural policy, agricultural resilience, food security, climate change, biodiversity loss, Sustainable Development Goals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review