Generative AI and media accessibility for disabled audiences in Ibero-America
Open accessAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can now produce, at marginal cost, the services that make media accessible to audiences with disabilities: automatic captioning and subtitling, audio description, sign-language rendering, text simplification, and image description. In the underfunded, platform-dependent, and linguistically plural media ecology of Ibero-America, this capacity is widely promoted as the means to close a persistent accessibility gap. Yet the same systems reproduce ableist assumptions and fail silently, raising the prospect that automation will scale a counterfeit of access rather than access itself. This conceptual article asks under what conditions GenAI expands, rather than simulates, communicational accessibility for persons with disabilities. Through a critical synthesis of media accessibility studies, the disability-and-AI literature, and regional communication research, with every source verified at the level of its digital object identifier, it constructs a four-dimensional framework (provision, fidelity, representation, and governance) positioned along two axes that distinguish scale from situatedness and substitution from augmentation. Applied to the principal access services, the framework shows that no service is uniformly safe and that governance is the consistent variable separating genuine access from accessibility theatre. The article concludes that the decisive factor is not the capability of the model but the governance of its deployment, and it proposes a participatory, empirical, and policy agenda in which the region's public-interest media could lead.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
- Authors
- Galasso, B.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Galasso, Bruno
- ORCID
- Galasso, Bruno
- Venue
- Cuadernos.info
- Published
- 2026-09-29
- Issue
- 65
- Pages
- 168-188
- ISSN
- 0716-162X (ISSN-L)
- 0719-367X
- OpenAlex
- W7214743450
- Semantic Scholar
- 2e57639ebb7756dddc8eab38f1e855ac9dae663b
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cuadernos info (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
- Keywords
- generative AI, media accessibility, disability, Ibero-America, automatic captioning, subtitling, audio description, text simplification, picture description, ableism, public interest media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review