Cited by 3Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and BurnoutStress and Burnout Research

Evaluation of Burnout Syndrome in Medical Residents Following a “Rest after Shift” Intervention

Open access
Burgos, Lucrecia M., Battioni, Luciano, Costabel, Juan Pablo, Alves de Lima, Alberto·2018·Revista Argentina de Cardiologia

Abstract

Background: The burnout syndrome generates a negative impact on professional performance, patient´s safety and resident´s life.Despite this problem has become important in the residency programs in Argentina, effective measures to prevent burnout among residents have not been evaluated yet.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of the burnout syndrome before and after the implementation of rest after shift in cardiology residents.Methods: An analytic and prospective study was conducted using the Maslach burnout questionnaire in cardiology residents of an institution in the city of Buenos Aires, before and after the implementation of a day of rest (DOR) after a 24-hour shift.Results: The survey was responded by 42 residents (2014: 19; 2015: 23).There was a trend towards lower prevalence of burnout in the DOR group (26.1% vs. 47.4% p=0.152) and better outcomes in the depersonalization scale [19 (11-21) vs. 10 (1-17) p=0.023].Women and residents who had moved to Buenos Aires presented lower degrees of exhaustion and depersonalization.Conclusions: The implementation of DOR after a 24-hour shift was associated with a reduction in the depersonalization scale, particularly among women.We emphasize the importance of creating prevention strategies aimed at improving residents' working conditions and quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7775/rac.v86.i2.9820

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organizational interventions showed no statistically significant association with any burnout domain (EE, DP, PA).

    “In organizational intervention studies [44, 45, 47–49, 73, 76], pooling of post-intervention intervention Cohen’s d SMD yielded non-statistically significant resulted in all outcomes, EE (-0.22, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.04, p = 0.10, I2 = 62.6%) (Fig. 3A), DP (-0.15, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.08, p = 0.21, I2 = 53.0%) (Fig. 3B), and PA (0.12, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.25, p = 0.07; I2 = 0%) (Fig. 3C).”
  • In the organizational work-hour intervention subgroup, there was no significant post-intervention effect across all outcome domains: EE -0.20 (95% CI -0.58 to 0.17, p = 0.29, I2 = 67.1%), DP -0.16 (95% CI -0.48 to 0.16, p = 0.33, I2 = 55.8%), and PA 0.04 (95% CI -0.12 to 0.20, p = 0.60, I2 = 0%).

    “Subgroup analyses revealed no post-intervention Cohen’s d SMD in work-hour interventions [44, 45, 47, 73, 76] across all outcome domains: EE (-0.20, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.17, p = 0.29, I2 = 67.1%), DP (-0.16, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.16, p = 0.33, I2 = 55.8%), and PA (0.04, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.20, p = 0.60, I2 = 0%).”
  • Outcome measurements were conducted using various versions of the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI): 26 studies used the 22-item MBI, 5 used the 9-item MBI, 1 used the 20-item Dutch version, and 1 used the 16-item MBI.

    “Outcome measurements were conducted using various versions of the validated MBI. Specifically, 26 studies (78.7%) used the 22-item MBI [44, 45, 47–49, 51, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60–65, 67, 68, 70–76], 5 studies (15.2%) employed the 9-item MBI [50, 53, 55, 59, 69], 1 study (3.0%) used the 20-item Dutch version of the MBI [57], and 1 study (3.0%) utilized the 16-item MBI [66].”
  • The majority of studies employed non-randomized, non-concurrent designs, with 9 using historical controls, 13 utilizing self-control studies, and 11 randomized controlled concurrent trials.

    “The majority of studies employed non-randomized, non-concurrent designs, with 9 (27.2%) using historical controls [44, 48, 49, 56, 59, 68, 71, 75, 76] and 13 (39.4%) utilizing self-control studies [47, 50, 53, 54, 58, 61, 65–67, 69, 70, 72, 73]. Eleven (33.3%) studies were randomized, controlled, concurrent trials [45, 51, 52, 55, 57, 60–64, 74].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgos, L. M., Battioni, L., Costabel, J. P., & Alves de Lima, A.
Affiliations
Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires (AR)
Venue
Revista Argentina de Cardiologia
Published
2018-04-30
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
123-126
OpenAlex
W4235927085
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Revista Argentina de Cardiología
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
burnout, medical residents, shift work, physician well-being, occupational stress, intervention evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review