Cited by 43Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmacy and Medical PracticesSleep and related disorders

Patient Education and Pharmacist Consultation Influence on Nonbenzodiazepine Sedative Medication Deprescribing Success for Older Adults

Open access
Kuntz, Jennifer L, Kouch, Louis, Christian, Daniel, Hu, Weiming, Peterson, Preston L·2019·The Permanente Journal

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Use of nonbenzodiazepine sedative hypnotics or "Z-drugs"-including eszopiclone, zolpidem, or zaleplon-is discouraged for older adults; however, these medications commonly are prescribed to treat insomnia in this population. We evaluated the impact of direct-to-patient education, with or without a pharmacist consultation, on Z-drug discontinuation among Kaiser Permanente Northwest members age 64 years and older. METHODS: We randomized 150 patients to usual care (UC), educational information only, or educational information and pharmacist consultation. Patients age 64 years and older who received 2 to 3 Z-drug fills in 2016 were included. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds of discontinuation at 6 months among patients who received either intervention, compared with those who received UC. RESULTS: Patients who received education only and education plus pharmacist consultation were significantly more likely to discontinue Z-drug use than those who received UC (28/50 of those who received education only and 27/49 of those who received education plus consultation vs 13/50 patients who received UC). After controlling for patient demographics, comorbidity, and antianxiety and antidepressant medication use, patients who received education only had greater odds of Z-drug discontinuation than those in the UC group (adjusted odds ratio = 4.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.66-9.77). Patients who received education and a pharmacist call also had greater odds of discontinuing use of these drugs than those in the UC group (adjusted odds ratio = 4.10, 95% confidence interval = 1.65-10.19). CONCLUSION: Patients who received direct-to-patient education with or without a pharmacist consultation were significantly more likely to discontinue Z-drug use than patients receiving UC. Providing evidence-based information about Z-drug use is an effective and low-resource method to encourage drug discontinuation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7812/tpp/18-161

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings regarding self-guided CBT-I are inconsistent; some studies demonstrated a significant reduction in Z-drug use among intervention groups compared to controls, while another study reported no significant effect on hypnotic discontinuation.

    “Findings regarding self-guided CBT-I are inconsistent. While some studies 78 79 have demonstrated a significant reduction in Z-drug use among individuals in the intervention groups compared to the controls, another study 77 reported no significant effect on hypnotic discontinuation.”

    From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [78]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 43

Authors
Kuntz, J. L., Kouch, L., Christian, D., Hu, W., & Peterson, P. L.
Affiliations
  • The Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Northwest Data and Analysis Center, The Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
Venue
The Permanente Journal
Published
2019-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
18-161
ISSN
  • 1552-5767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5775
OpenAlex
W2907989884
Cited by
43
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Permanente Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
Z-drugs, deprescribing, patient education, pharmacist counseling, drug discontinuation, older adults, insomnia, zolpidem, eszopiclone, zaleplon, Kaiser Permanente
MeSH terms
Deprescriptions, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Community Pharmacy Services, Female, Health Services, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Comorbidity, Odds Ratio, Polypharmacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review