Cited by 1Historical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesEurasian Exchange Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 54 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Half-human and Monstrous Races in Zoroastrian Tradition

Open access
Agostini, Domenico·2021·Journal of the American Oriental Society

Abstract

Legends and stories about fabulous races that dwelt in India or in Africa circulated in Iran probably since the Achaemenid times. Unfortunately, scholarship on this topic has neglected some late Iranian and, especially, Zoroastrian sources, such as Draxt ī āsūrīg (The Assyrian tree), the Bundahišn (Primal Creation), the Ayādgār ī Jāmāspīg (The memorial of Jāmāsp), and the New Persian epic Šāhnāme. This article examines the aforementioned sources and discusses their accounts of five fabulous races from an Iranian, and especially Zoroastrian, perspective and through a comparative approach to some similar neighboring traditions.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article surveys how several Zoroastrian and Iranian texts depict half-human or monstrous races, especially dog-headed, breast-eyed, breast-eared, leather-strap-legged, and dwarf peoples. It argues that these portrayals vary by source and genre, from peaceful and commercial in the *Draxt ī āsūrīg* to demonic and cannibalistic in the *Ayādgār ī Jāmāspīg*, with the *Bundahišn* placing them within a cosmogonic taxonomy and the *Šāhnāme* echoing Pahlavi and Alexander Romance traditions.

Key findings

  • The *Draxt ī āsūrīg* presents dwarfs, breast-eyed, and dog-headed races as living peacefully beyond India near the Warkaš Sea, eating leaves and goat’s milk and engaging in trade; the text uses them to praise the goat’s value.
  • The *Bundahišn* 14:36 lists twenty-five human races descended from Gayōmard, including breast-eared, breast-eyed, one-legged, winged, tailed, monkey-like, giant Māzandarān people six times normal height, and dwarfs one sixth of normal height, alongside historical peoples such as Romans, Turks, Chinese, Arabs, Sindhis, Indians, and Iranians.
  • The *Ayādgār ī Jāmāspīg* 9 gives the most detailed social and religious portrait: most of these races, except dwarfs, are aligned with Ahriman, lack law and religion, and practice cannibalism; dwarfs are skillful servants aligned with Ohrmazd and may go to paradise or hell.
  • The *Šāhnāme* refers to dog-headed, supple-legged/leather-legged, and breast-eared peoples, often locating them in or near Māzandarān/Caspian regions; the dog-headed are bellicose and dirty, and the supple-legged appear both as brave horsemen and as savage stone-throwers, showing continued influence of Alexander Romance material.

Methods

  • The study is a comparative philological and literary analysis of Middle Persian/Pahlavi, Pārsi, and New Persian sources, centered on the *Draxt ī āsūrīg*, *Bundahišn*, *Ayādgār ī Jāmāspīg*, and *Šāhnāme*.
  • It compares these Iranian accounts with Greek, Latin, Syriac, Manichaean, and other neighboring traditions, including Ctesias, Megasthenes, Pliny, Aelian, the Alexander Romance, and Syriac Alexander-related texts.
  • The analysis uses manuscript transcriptions and translations, with attention to textual emendations and terminology such as *sag-sarān*, *war-čašmān*, *war-gōšān*, *dawāl-pāyān*, and *widestīgān*.

Limitations

  • The paper states that several historical, social, and literary dynamics behind the three models remain unclear and calls for further investigation.
  • It repeatedly marks specific claims as uncertain or speculative, including the geographical referent of Warkaš, the dating and source relations of some traditions, and the idea that these races belonged to the ancient Kərəsāspa/Garšāsp legend.
  • Evident from the text: the argument depends heavily on late, fragmentary, and sometimes emended Pahlavi, Pārsi, and New Persian manuscripts, while extant Avestan texts do not directly mention these races, so reconstruction relies on comparative and later sources.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7817/jameroriesoci.139.4.0805

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

44 Sources not found · 21 Own interpretation · 13 No basis given · 3 Own result

Show all 31 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 37
50 of 50
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Legends about fabulous races in India or Africa circulated in Iran probably since Achaemenid times.

    “Legends and stories about fabulous races that dwelt in India or in Africa circulated in Iran probably since the Achaemenid times”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The extant Avestan texts do not refer to such races.

    “Though the extant Avestan texts do not refer to such races,”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Draxt ī āsūrīg underwent a long period of oral transmission.

    “It underwent a long period of oral transmission .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Bundahišn's first compilation probably occurred in the late Sasanian period.

    “It is not possible to date the first compilation, but it probably took place in the late Sasanian period .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Šāhnāme draws on early Iranian mythical sources.

    “The eleventh-century epic Šāhnāme, which also draws on early Iranian mythical sources, refers to some of these races”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The original Parthian composition of the Draxt ī āsūrīg is chronologically very close to the Classical Greek and Latin model.

    “to which the original Parthian composition of the text is even chronologically very close”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Edward William West, Pahlavi Texts, part 4 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1892), 25-26, translation .
  2. Paul Allan Mirecki and Jason BeDuhn (Leiden: Brill, 2001), 181-99, at 186-188, edition and translation . 29 . See ibid ., 194-96, edition and translation .
  3. Three parallel passages are found in a Persian fragment listing the ten species of men (see Christian Bartholo- mae, Die Zendhandschriften der K. Hof-und Staatsbibliotek in München [München: Palm, 1915], 80), in the Persian Rivāyats of Hormazyar Framarz (see Ervad Bamanji Nusserwanji Dhabhar, The Persian Rivayats of Hormazyar Fra- marz and Others [Bombay: Cama Oriental Institute, 1932], 257), and in an incomplete Sogdian magic text, P 3 (see Émile Benveniste, Textes sogdiens [Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner, 1940], 65, edition and translation) .
  4. For a historical study and edition of this book, see Domenico Agostini, Ayādgār ī Jāmāspīg: Un texte escha- tologique zoroastrien (Rome: Gregorian and Biblical Press, 2013) .
  5. On the fabulous people in the Alexander Romance, see Richard Stoneman, "Romantic Ethnography: Central Asia and India in the Alexander Romance," The Ancient World 25 (1994): 93-107 .
  6. In the context of the circulation of this topic in the Early Islamic period through ʿajāʾib and encyclopedic literature, this monstrous race is already cited in the ninth-century Arabic Kitāb al-hayāwān (Book of the Animals) by al-Jāḥiẓ' in a corrupt Persian form, al-dawāl-bāy (see Natalia L . Tornesello, "From Reality to Legend: Historical Sources of Hellenistic and Islamic Teratology," Studia Iranica 31 [2002]: 163-92, at 165-66) . In the same work, Tornesello offers an outstanding comparison between the Iranian Islamic sources on monstrous and half-human people and Hellenistic literature . On the ʿajāʾib literature, see Travis Zadeh, "The Wiles of Creation: Philosophy, Fiction, and the 'Ajā'ib Tradition," Middle Eastern Literatures 13 (2010): 21-48 .
  7. See Elizabeth Hazelton Haight, The Life of Alexander of Macedon by Pseudo-Callisthenes (New York: Longmans, Green, 1955), 122, translation . See also Stoneman, "Romantic Ethnography," 95 . On the complicated transmission of the different recensions of the Greek text, see Stoneman, The Greek Alexander Romance (London: Penguin Books, 1991), 28-32;
  8. See Jürgen Trumpf, Vita Alexandri Regis Macedonum (Stuttgart: Teubner, 1974), 103, edition .
  9. See respectively Augustus Taber Murray, Homer: Iliad, 2 vols . (rev . by William F . Wyatt) (orig . ed . Cam- bridge, Mass .: Harvard Univ . Press, 1924), 128-29 (vol . , edition and translation; Rackham, Pliny, 522-23 (vol .
  10. Kiessling, Ionnis Tzetzae, 269, edition) .
  11. On Alexander's gate and its location, see Andrew Runni Anderson, "Alexander at the Caspian Gates," Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 59 (1928): 130-63 .
  12. See James Darmesteter, The Zend-Avesta: The Vendîdâd, part I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1880), 7, transla- tion . On this great Iranian hero, see Prods Oktor Skjærvø, "Karsāsp," in Encyclopædia Iranica 15, ed . Ehsan Yar- shater (New York: Encyclopædia Iranica Foundation, 2011), 601-7 .
  13. See Mahnaz Moazami, Wrestling with the Demons of the Pahlavi Widēwdād (Leiden: Brill, 2014), 34-35, edition and translation . 73 . Similarly, Bundahišn 31:17-18 locates the witch-desire in Kāwul, in Kāwulestān, as well as the demon- worship that Sām (in early tradition one of the names of Karsāsp) used to practice (see Pakzad, Bundahišn, 354-55, edition) .
  14. Djalal Khaleghi- Motlagh ("Bozgūš," in Encyclopædia Iranica 4, ed . Ehsan Yarshater [New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2001], 425) suggests that here Māzandarān might also refer to the place located between India and the Warkaš Sea in the Draxt ī āsūrīg 89 .
  15. On the victory of the hero Frēdōn and the banishment of the people of Māzandarān from Xwanirah, see Dēnkard VII .1:26 (see Marijan Molé, La legende de Zoroastre selon les textes pehlevis [Paris: C . Klincksieck, 1967], 8-9, edition and translation), and Ayādgār ī Jāmāspīg 4: 33-37 (see Agostini, Ayādgār ī Jāmāspīg, 45-54, 96-99, edition and translation) .
  16. See Marijan Molé, "Garshâsp et les Sagsār," La Nouvelle Clio 3 (1951): 128-38, esp . 129-31;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Agostini, D.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Agostini, Domenico
Venue
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Published
2021-09-19
Volume
139
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-2289
OpenAlex
W2995068330
Cited by
1
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
  • ARCHIVIO ISTITUZIONALE DELLA RICERCA-UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI "LORIENTALE" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
Keywords
monstrous races, Iranian mythology, comparative mythology, Achaemenid period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Half-human and Monstrous Races in Zoroastrian Tradition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7817/jameroriesoci.139.4.0805
The paper
Agostini, D. (2021). Half-human and Monstrous Races in Zoroastrian Tradition. Journal of the American Oriental Society. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.139.4.0805