Cited by 2Chinese history and philosophyIndian and Buddhist StudiesCultural and Mythological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 33 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Anxiety over the Filial Body: Discussions on Xiao in Early Confucian Texts

Open access
He, Jianjun·2021·Journal of the American Oriental Society

Abstract

This paper reexamines the concept of filial piety (xiao) from a specific perspective, asking how filial piety is performed by and observed on the body. I argue that in pre-Qin and Han Confucian texts, there was a strong anxiety over the potential hypocrisies of filial deeds; that is, the fact that filial piety could be abused and transformed to become a mere show intended for gaining fame and reputation. Because of this, early commentators felt the need to create methods and criteria for evaluating filial piety. One important way to do this was to examine how filial piety was materialized through the ritual performance of the body. Filial piety was thus embodied and evaluated in terms of corporality. Ironically, this embodiment of filial piety had its own paradox as filial piety could become oversimplified as physical care of the parents and the ritual of xiao be reduced to a performance.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper argues that early Confucian discussions of filial piety were anxious about hypocrisy because xiao had to be displayed through ritualized bodily conduct, making it visible and judgeable. This embodiment created a paradox: ritual performance could become empty show, while efforts to prove sincerity led to extreme bodily displays such as emaciation and self-harm.

Key findings

In the *Analects*, the paper counts fourteen passages on xiao; about half treat it as a desirable social quality, while the rest define it, with Confucius stressing obedience and ritual guidance rather than affection. Confucius distinguishes *jing* (reverence) from *yang* (nourishment), rejecting mere physical care as false filial piety; Mencius lists five commonly recognized unfilial acts, the first three involving neglect of parents’ nourishment and the last two endangering parents or their reputation. The *Lüshi chunqiu* lists five ways of nourishing, four of which concern material comfort, while the *Liji* ranks filial deeds with honoring parents highest, not shaming them second, and providing nourishment lowest. Later *Shishuo xinyu* anecdotes about Wang Rong, He Qiao, and Ruan Ji show extreme emaciation or vomiting blood being read as proof of sincere filial feeling against ritual performance, illustrating the unresolved paradox.

Methods

Conceptual and textual study of pre-Qin and Han Confucian writings, including the *Analects*, *Mencius*, *Liji*, *Lüshi chunqiu*, *Xunzi*, and later *Shishuo xinyu* anecdotes. Close reading and thematic analysis of how xiao is performed on and observed through the body, especially ritual (*li*) and reverence (*jing*) versus nourishment (*yang*). No empirical sample or quantitative analysis; the paper engages textual passages and scholarly interlocutors such as Holzman, Knapp, and Nylan.

Limitations

No formal limitations section is provided; the paper notes uncertainty about the Kuang Zhang story and an ambiguous *Analects* sentence. Evident from the text: the argument is interpretive and based on selected canonical and anecdotal sources rather than a systematic corpus, with a focus on elite ritual discourse and textual representations. Evident from the text: causal claims about anxiety and paradox are inferred from prescriptive and anecdotal sources rather than direct historical evidence of practitioners’ motives.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0301

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

76 Own interpretation · 32 Sources not found · 2 Not checked yet · 2 Own result

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 41
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 51
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
74 of 74
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Liji and other early texts reliably represent early Confucian views and practices.

    “Early Confucian texts carefully distinguish the rules of burial and the ritual of sacrifice and prescribe different bodily performances accordingly.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Shishuo xinyu anecdotes reliably reflect fourth-century attitudes toward filial piety and mourning.

    “The following story from Shishuo xinyu 世說新語 illustrates this:”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Translation with slight adaptations from John Knoblock and Jeffrey Riegel, tr., The Annals of Lü Buwei (Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 2000), 305.
  2. See Liji yijie, 694. Interestingly, this sentence is not found in the Da Dai Liji. Translation adapted from James Legge, The Li Ki: The Sacred Books of China (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1885), part IV, 226. lungs are easily affected by loss and longing. See Paul Unschuld, Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen: Nature, Knowledge, Imagery in an Ancient Chinese Medical Text (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 2003), 133.
  3. Translation adapted from Eric Hutton, Xunzi: The Complete Text (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2014), 210.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
He, J.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
He, Jianjun
Venue
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Published
2021-09-19
Volume
140
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-2289
OpenAlex
W3041779936
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
Keywords
filial piety, Confucianism, embodiment, ritual performance, hypocrisy, reputation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review