Recent Trends and Scope of Nanotechnology in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Narrative Review
Open accessAbstract
Orthopaedic implants osseointegrate better using nanophase materials because they mimic the natural trabecular bone structure better. Additionally, prostheses with nanophase coatings can lessen bacterial adherence compared to prostheses with traditional surfaces. Improved osseointegration and infection prevention may be possible with nano-coated joint replacement implants. Other potential applications with strong in-vitro findings include rapidly integrating fillers for osteochondral flaws, antitumour seleniumcoated endoprostheses, along with potent targeted Drug Delivery Systems (DDSs) for infection prevention and treatment of chronic overuse injuries. It is significant to focus on the use of nanotechnology in artificial joint replacement prostheses, drug delivery utilising nanotechnology, surgical oncology of the skeleton using nanotechnology, bone cell function using nanotechnology, applications in orthopaedic surgery, and, finally, the use of nanotechnology and its potential new fields of study for human welfare. Before nanophase devices are approved for clinical use, significant progress must be made in comprehending the potential health concerns associated with their creation, implantation, and usage habits. However, they have a lot of potential and will probably be helpful to all of us in the future. Nanotechnology is a fast-advancing area, and its applications in orthopaedic surgery are continually expanding. This review article enables academics, clinicians, and other stakeholders to stay up-to-date on the most recent advancements, innovations, and achievements in the integration of nanotechnology into orthopaedic operations. The article also focuses on the challenges of applying nanotechnology in orthopaedics, such as biocompatibility issues, regulatory hurdles, and financial considerations. Simultaneously, it can discuss potential avenues for further research, collaboration, and progress in overcoming these challenges. Discussing the practical applications and clinical consequences of nanotechnology in orthopaedic surgery is crucial. The evaluation can explore on how these improvements will affect patient outcomes, surgical techniques, and overall healthcare practices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical evidence for collagen-derived peptides remains limited, and some trials have reported only marginal benefits over standard treatment protocols.
“However, clinical evidence remains limited, and some trials have reported only marginal benefits over standard treatment protocols [118].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goulian, A. J., Goldstein, B., & Saad, M. A. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14062061 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“However, clinical evidence remains limited, and some trials have reported only marginal benefits over standard treatment protocols [118].”
- Authors
- Pol, S. H. S.
- Corresponding author
- Pol, Shri Hari S
- Venue
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
- Publisher
- JCDR Research and Publications
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 0973-709X (ISSN-L)
- 2249-782X
- OpenAlex
- W4399015452
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
- Keywords
- orthopedic implants, osseointegration, bacterial adhesion, infection control, osteochondral defects, targeted drug delivery, bone cell function, biocompatibility, regulatory challenges, nanomaterial safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review