Cited by 2Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyNanotechnology research and applications

Recent Trends and Scope of Nanotechnology in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Narrative Review

Open access
Pol, Shri Hari S·2024·JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH

Abstract

Orthopaedic implants osseointegrate better using nanophase materials because they mimic the natural trabecular bone structure better. Additionally, prostheses with nanophase coatings can lessen bacterial adherence compared to prostheses with traditional surfaces. Improved osseointegration and infection prevention may be possible with nano-coated joint replacement implants. Other potential applications with strong in-vitro findings include rapidly integrating fillers for osteochondral flaws, antitumour seleniumcoated endoprostheses, along with potent targeted Drug Delivery Systems (DDSs) for infection prevention and treatment of chronic overuse injuries. It is significant to focus on the use of nanotechnology in artificial joint replacement prostheses, drug delivery utilising nanotechnology, surgical oncology of the skeleton using nanotechnology, bone cell function using nanotechnology, applications in orthopaedic surgery, and, finally, the use of nanotechnology and its potential new fields of study for human welfare. Before nanophase devices are approved for clinical use, significant progress must be made in comprehending the potential health concerns associated with their creation, implantation, and usage habits. However, they have a lot of potential and will probably be helpful to all of us in the future. Nanotechnology is a fast-advancing area, and its applications in orthopaedic surgery are continually expanding. This review article enables academics, clinicians, and other stakeholders to stay up-to-date on the most recent advancements, innovations, and achievements in the integration of nanotechnology into orthopaedic operations. The article also focuses on the challenges of applying nanotechnology in orthopaedics, such as biocompatibility issues, regulatory hurdles, and financial considerations. Simultaneously, it can discuss potential avenues for further research, collaboration, and progress in overcoming these challenges. Discussing the practical applications and clinical consequences of nanotechnology in orthopaedic surgery is crucial. The evaluation can explore on how these improvements will affect patient outcomes, surgical techniques, and overall healthcare practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7860/jcdr/2024/69980.19480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pol, S. H. S.
Corresponding author
Pol, Shri Hari S
Venue
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2024
ISSN
  • 0973-709X (ISSN-L)
  • 2249-782X
OpenAlex
W4399015452
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
Keywords
orthopedic implants, osseointegration, bacterial adhesion, infection control, osteochondral defects, targeted drug delivery, bone cell function, biocompatibility, regulatory challenges, nanomaterial safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review