The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rational prescribing: the principles of drug selection and assessment of efficacy
Open accessAbstract
sulfamethoxazole desensitization in HIV-infected patients: an open study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Avorn J, Chen M, Hartley R. Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. Am J Med 1982;73:4-8.
- Barber N. What constitutes good pre- scribing? BMJ 1995;310:923-5.
- Blue JW, Colburn WA. Efficacy measures: surrogates or clinical outcomes? J Clin Pharmacol 1996;36:767-70.
- Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Holbrook A, McAlister FA. Users' guides to the med- ical literature: XIX. Applying clinical trial results. A. How to use an article measuring the effect of an intervention on surrogate end points. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1999;282:771-8.
- De Vries TP. Presenting clinical pharma- cology and therapeutics: a problem based approach for choosing and prescribing drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993;35:581-6.
- Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Review. Ann Intern Med 1996;125: 605-13.
- Hogerzeil HV. Promoting rational pre- scribing: an international perspective. Review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998;39:1-6.
- McGavock H. Promoting rational therapeu- tics: the Swedish guidelines and a UK response. Br J Gen Pract 1990;40:47-8.
- Roland M, Toorgerson D. Understanding controlled trials: what outcomes should be measured? Review. BMJ 1998;317:1075.
- Schwartz RK, Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Physician motivations of nonscientific drug prescribing. Soc Sci Med 1989;28:577-82.
- Scott DK, Ferner RE. 'The strategy of desire' and rational prescribing. Review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1994;37:217-9.
Cited by
Cole, C. P., & Routledge, P. (2018) · Pan African Medical Journal · doi:10.11604/pamj.2018.31.174.16729 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Waller, D. G.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Waller, Derek G
- Venue
- Clinical Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-28
- ISSN
- 1470-2118 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4954061
- OpenAlex
- W2317603584
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Keywords
- rational prescribing, drug selection, efficacy evaluation, sulfamethoxazole, drug desensitization, HIV infection
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Drug Prescriptions, Polypharmacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
