Cited by 74Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Prenatal Diagnosis of Turner Syndrome: Report on 69 Cases

Papp, Csaba, Beke, Artur, Mezei, Gabor, Szigeti, Zsanett, Bán, Zoltán, Papp, Zoltan·2006·Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of different sonographic signs of fetuses with Turner syndrome in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2004, Turner syndrome was found in 69 of 22,150 fetal karyotypings. Congenital anomalies detected by sonography were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 514 (2.3%; 514/22,150) chromosome aberrations that were diagnosed, 69 Turner syndrome cases were found (13.4%; 69/514). Twenty-four fetuses had a 45,X karyotype (34.8%), and 45 fetuses were mosaic (65.2%). Forty-seven fetuses (68.1%; 47/69) showed symptoms on sonography. A substantial proportion of fetuses with Turner syndrome showed early-onset signs that could be detected in the first trimester (29.8%;14/69). The most common findings with sonography were hygroma colli (26.1%; 18/69), fetal hydrops (11.6%; 8/69), cardiac defects (13%; 9/69), and increased nuchal translucency (13%; 9/69). Among heart defects, coarctation of the aorta was the most common (44.4% of all cardial defects). Soft markers were also detected with relatively high frequency (23.2%; 16/69). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of severe Turner syndrome is possible in early pregnancy. A search for soft markers during second-trimester sonography and extensive use of echocardiography may increase the detection rate of Turner syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.711

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fetal echocardiographic studies detected CHD in only 13% to 16% of fetuses with TS, as compared to the 50% prevalence of CHD on postnatal images.

    “Therefore, it is not surprising that fetal echocardiographic studies detected CHD in only 13% to 16% of fetuses with TS, as compared to the 50% prevalence of CHD on postnatal images.401,402”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 74

Authors
Papp, C., Beke, A., Mezei, G., Szigeti, Z., Bán, Z., & Papp, Z.
Affiliations
Semmelweis University (HU)
Corresponding author
Papp, Csaba
Venue
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
711-717
ISSN
  • 0278-4297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9613
OpenAlex
W2203509311
Cited by
74
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
Turner syndrome, prenatal diagnosis, fetal sonography, 45,X karyotype, mosaicism, first-trimester ultrasound, second-trimester ultrasound, hydrops fetalis, congenital heart disease, coarctation of the aorta, nuchal translucency, soft markers, echocardiography
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Turner Syndrome, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review