The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial variation in the importance of different prey types in the diet of red foxes
Abstract
Invasive predators are identified as an important threatening process implicated in native species decline and extinction in Australia. This study aimed at developing our understanding of landscape-level spatial patterns in the red fox diet. We established prey importance based on dietary composition of red fox scats, and related this information to landscape structure. The relationship between scat composition and the frequency of detection and spatial patterns of occurrence of small mammals based on survey data from the same region was also evaluated using ordination analyses. We found that native vertebrates, dominated by Sminthopsinae, were the most important prey. However, Mus musculus were detected significantly more than Sminthopsinae across the region. Sminthopsinae were detected most frequently in traps in grazing landscapes; however, red fox scats from grazing landscapes were dominated by invertebrates. We propose these patterns may be partially driven by M. musculus abundance attracting predation pressure to the landscape and Sminthopsinae exhibiting prey naivety resulting in their disproportional representation in red fox scats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Less abundant prey may be preferred by foxes over more abundant prey if less abundant prey species are naïve to fox predation, making them easier to capture (Graham et al. 2017), or if foxes have evolved adaptations to prey more successfully on those species (optimal foraging).”
From Variation in red fox Vulpes vulpes diet in five continents (2022) · cites this paper as Graham et al. 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Variation in red fox Vulpes vulpes diet in five continents
Castañeda, I., Doherty, T. S., Fleming, P. A., Stobo‐Wilson, A. M., Woinarski, J. C. Z., & Newsome, T. M. (2022) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12292 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, C. A., Maron, M., & McAlpine, C. A.
- Affiliations
- 1. The University of Queensland, Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, Brisbane, Australia. 4068
- Venue
- Australian Zoologist
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2017-09-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 610-628
- ISSN
- 0067-2238
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial variation in the importance of different prey types in the diet of red foxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7882/az.2017.025
- The paper
- Graham, C. A., Maron, M., & McAlpine, C. A. (2017). Spatial variation in the importance of different prey types in the diet of red foxes. Australian Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2017.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.