The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization
Abstract
In the first part of this thesis, we introduce a specific class of Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMI) whose optimal solution can be characterized exactly. This family corresponds to the case where the associated linear operator maps the cone of positive semidefinite matrices onto itself. In this case, the optimal value equals the spectral radius of the operator. It is shown that some rank minimization problems, as well as generalizations of the structured singular value ($\\mu$) LMIs, have exactly this property. In the same spirit of exploiting structure to achieve computational efficiency, an algorithm for the numerical solution of a special class of frequency-dependent LMIs is presented. These optimization problems arise from robustness analysis questions, via the Kalman-Yakubovich-Popov lemma. The procedure is an outer approximation method based on the algorithms used in the computation of \\hinf\\ norms for linear, time invariant systems. The result is especially useful for systems with large state dimension. The other main contribution in this thesis is the formulation of a convex optimization framework for semialgebraic problems, i.e., those that can be expressed by polynomial equalities and inequalities. The key element is the interaction of concepts in real algebraic geometry (Positivstellensatz) and semidefinite programming. To this end, an LMI formulation for the sums of squares decomposition for multivariable polynomials is presented. Based on this, it is shown how to construct sufficient Positivstellensatz-based convex tests to prove that certain sets are empty. Among other applications, this leads to a nonlinear extension of many LMI based results in uncertain linear system analysis. Within the same framework, we develop stronger criteria for matrix copositivity, and generalizations of the well-known standard semidefinite relaxations for quadratic programming. Some applications to new and previously studied problems are presented. A few examples are Lyapunov function computation, robust bifurcation analysis, structured singular values, etc. It is shown that the proposed methods allow for improved solutions for very diverse questions in continuous and combinatorial optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goemans, M. X., & Williamson, D. P. (1995) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/227683.227684 · Cited by 3,587
Some NP-complete problems in quadratic and nonlinear programming
Murty, K. G., & Kabadi, S. N. (1987) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf02592948 · Cited by 1,003
Cited by
A Comparison of the Sherali-Adams, Lovász-Schrijver, and Lasserre Relaxations for 0–1 Programming
Laurent, M. (2003) · Mathematics of Operations Research · doi:10.1287/moor.28.3.470.16391 · Cited by 373
Mélykúti, B., August, E., Papachristodoulou, A., & El-Samad, H. (2010) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-4-38 · Cited by 58
Learning dynamic polynomial proofs
Fawzi, A., Malinowski, M., Fawzi, H., & Fawzi, O. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.01681 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Parrilo, P. A.
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2133404041
- Cited by
- 1,802
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7907/2k6y-ch43
- The paper
- Parrilo, P. A. (2000). Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization. https://doi.org/10.7907/2k6y-ch43
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.