The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Getting Ready for College: An Implementation and Early Impact Study of Eight Texas Developmental Summer Bridge Programs
Abstract
Displayed on billboards and license plates alike, “College for All Texans” is the unofficial motto that is promoted statewide to encourage college readiness, participation, and success in Texas. Policymakers, educators, and business leaders agree that Texas must increase rates of college participation and success to preserve the economic vitality of the state and to secure the future well-being of Texas residents. To address the dynamic needs of the growing state population, Texas launched in 2000 an ambitious statewide strategic plan called called Closing the Gaps by 2015. One of the primary objectives of this plan is to increase enrollment and academic success in Texas colleges and universities. One component of the Closing the Gaps by 2015 initiative was the creation of developmental summer bridge programs — intensive summer experiences that offer eligible students remedial instruction in math, reading, and/or writing along with an introduction to college. Developmental summer bridge programs aim to reduce or eliminate the need for developmental courses so that more students are prepared for college-level courses in their first semester of college. Programs typically offer intensive, targeted coursework for four to five weeks over the summer, accompanied by tutoring, additional labs, and student support services. The integrated approach used in developmental summer bridge programs is thought to help ease students’ transition into college. But despite the increasing popularity of summer bridge programs across the country, little empirical research on their outcomes or impacts has been conducted
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite the variation among different implementations of SBPs, research on specific programs shows that these programs can positively impact students' experiences during their first year (Barth et al., 2021), persistence in higher education (Ikuma et al., 2019) and pass rates (Wathington et al., 2011).”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Wathington et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Challenge of Summer Bridge Programs
Sablan, J. R. (2014) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213515234 · Cited by 95
The Impact of Summer Bridge Programs on College Students' STEM Career Aspirations
Kitchen, J. A., Sadler, P., & Sonnert, G. (2018) · Journal of College Student Development · doi:10.1353/csd.2018.0066 · Cited by 46
Examining the effectiveness of an online summer bridge course to prepare students for calculus
Jura, M., & Gerhardt, I. (2022) · PRIMUS · doi:10.1080/10511970.2021.1919256 · Cited by 6
Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review
Caballero Díaz, D., Amin, A., Musa, P., & Leung, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020220
Metadata
- Authors
- Wathington, H. D., Barnett, E., Weissman, E., Teres, J., Pretlow, J., Nakanishi, A., Zeidenberg, M., Trimble, M. J., Black, A., Mitchell, C., & Wachen, J.
- Venue
- Columbia University
- Publisher
- Columbia University
- Published
- 2011
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Getting Ready for College: An Implementation and Early Impact Study of Eight Texas Developmental Summer Bridge Programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7916/d8bk19fx
- The paper
- Wathington, H. D., Barnett, E., Weissman, E., Teres, J., Pretlow, J., Nakanishi, A., Zeidenberg, M., Trimble, M. J., Black, A., Mitchell, C., & Wachen, J. (2011). Getting Ready for College: An Implementation and Early Impact Study of Eight Texas Developmental Summer Bridge Programs. Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8bk19fx
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.